Abstract
Abstract. The idea that government should act as employer of last resort (ELR) is an old one. That idea is often referred to nowadays as “job guarantee”. Many ELR schemes to date have been confined to the public sector. There is no good reason for that limitation: i.e. the private sector should use ELR labour as well. A second common characteristic of ELR schemes has been that (like the WPA in the US in the 1930s) they involve specially set up projects or schemes as distinct from subsidising temporary employees into work with EXISTING employers. The “existing employer” option is preferable. Once those two common defects in ELR are removed, the result is a system where the unemployed are subsidised into temporary and relatively unproductive jobs with existing employers till better jobs appear. And that in turn is what the unemployed tend to do in a totally free market: a scenario where there are no minimum wage laws and unemployment benefit, and where the unemployed tend to get temporary low paid jobs in both public and private sectors pending the appearance of better jobs. In contrast to a free market, under ELR, take home pay is maintained at socially acceptable levels. Assuming that free markets maximise GDP, it follows that the sort of ELR system advocated here will also maximize GDP. That free market style ELR system actually resembles the ELR system that the UK has at the time of writing, namely the Work Programme. The latter “free market” / Work Programme system is not free of faults, but as long as ELR employees do not displace regular employees to too great an extent, that “free market” ELR system is better than traditional ELR.
Keywords. Employer of last resort, Job guarantee, Work project admistration.
JEL. J60, J63, J64, J68.
References
Bogdanor, A. (2004). Not Working. Policy Exchange, London. [Retrieved from].
Bolvig, I., Jensen, P., & Rosholm, M. (2003). The Employment Effect of Active Social Policy. Discussion Paper No.736, Institute for the Study of Labour (IZA), Bonn. [Retrieved from].
Booth, A.L., Francesconi, M., & Frank, J. (2000). Temporary jobs: Who Gets Them, What Are They Worth, And Do They Lead Anywhere? Discussion Paper, No.00/54, Institute for Labour Research, University of Essex.
Calmfors, L., Forslund, A., & Hemstrom, M. (2002). Does Active Labour Market Policy Work? - Lessons from the Swedish Experience. Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation, Uppsala. [Retrieved from].
Farmer, R. (2013). The Natural Rate Hypothesis: and Idea Past its Sell by Date. Bank of England. [Retrieved from].
Garraty, J.A. (1979). Unemployment in History. Harper & Row.
Gerfin, M., Lechner, M., & Steiger, H. (2002a). Does subsidised temporary employment get the unemployed back to work? An econometric analysis of two different schemes. Discussion Paper No. 3669, Social Science Research Network. [Retrieved from].
Gerfin, M., & Lechner, M. (2002b). A microeconomic evaluation of the active labour market policy in Switzerland. Economic Journal, 112(482), 854-893. doi. 10.1111/1468-0297.00072
Kesselman, J.R. (1978). Work relief programs in the Great Depression. In J.L.Palmer, (Ed.), Creating Jobs, Brookings Institution, Washington.
Mitchell, W.F. (1998). The buffer stock employment model and the path to full employment. Journal of Economic Issues, 32(2), 547-555. doi. 10.1080/00213624.1998.11506063
Mitchell, W.F., & Mosler, W. (2001). Unemployment and fiscal policy. In W.F. Mitchell & E. Carlson (Eds.), Unemployment: The Tip of the Iceberg, Centre for Applied Economic Research, University of New South Wales.
Mitchell, W. (2009).The Dreaded NAIRU is still about. [Retrieved from].
Modigliani, F., & Papademos, L. (1975). Targets for Monetary Policy in the Coming Year. Brookings. [Retrieved from].
Mosler, W. (1997). Full employment and price stability. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 20(2), 167-182. doi. 10.1080/01603477.1997.11490146
Musgrave, R.S. (1991). Workfare: A Marginal Employment Subsidy for Private and Public Sectors, MPRA Working Paper, No.14206. [Retrieved from].
Musgrave, R.S. (2006). A market imitating Subsidy, in B. Greve, (Ed.), The future of the Welfare State: European and Global Perspectives, Ashgate, Aldershot.
Musgrave, R.S. (2009). Creative destruction of ‘government as employer of last resort’. MPRA Working Paper, No. 19094. [Retrieved from].
Musgrave, R.S. (2017). A bit more NAIRU basher bashing. [Retrieved from].
Sawyer, M. (2003). Employer of last resort: Could It deliver full employment and price stability?, Journal of Economic Issues, 37(4), 881-907. doi. 10.1080/00213624.2003.11506635
Sawyer, M. (2005). Employer of fast resort: An extended response to my critics. [Retrieved from].
Werner, H. (1998). Countries with successful employment policies - what lies behind the success?, Mitteilungenaus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, 31(2), 324-333.
Wray, L.R. (1998). Zero unemployment and stable prices, Journal of Economic Issues 32(2), 539-545. doi. 10.1080/00213624.1998.11506062
Wray, L.R. (1999). Understanding Modern Money: The Key to Full Employment and Price Stability, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
