A mixed-method approach study in Brazil Congress: The vote on matters of high degree of technical complexity
PDF

How to Cite

SANTOS, P. G. F. (2023). A mixed-method approach study in Brazil Congress: The vote on matters of high degree of technical complexity. Turkish Economic Review, 10(1-2), 46–71. Retrieved from https://journals.econsciences.com/index.php/TER/article/view/2441

Abstract

Abstract. This article delves into the intricate relationship between legislative power, and public policy efficiency, exploring their impact on the formulation and implementation of public policies in Brazil. The study adopts a mixed-method approach, combining descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis, to shed light on this less-explored aspect of legislative functioning, investigating whether the Legislative Power in Brazil uses its competence to vote on matters of a specialized nature or delegates the rule to the Executive Power. The legislative process analyzed in this research is one of a Provisional Measure. This process is the most appropriate because it involves both houses of Congress and begins with the Executive branch enacting the rule. Descriptive statistics show correlations between key variables, while qualitative content analysis revealed a preference for the Legislative Power to regulate matters of technical nature rather than delegating them to specialized bodies. The study's findings underscore the importance of public trust in government actions, as both the Executive and Legislative branches need to prioritize transparency, accountability, and responsiveness to maintain public confidence in the regulatory process. Policymakers must carefully assess the context and objectives of each regulatory proposal to make informed decisions about delegation that best serve the public's interests and the government's effective functioning. 

Keywords. Congress; Competence; Technical expertise; Political representation; Mixed-method approach; Descriptive statistics; Qualitative content analysis; Brazil.

JEL. H77, K290.

PDF

References

Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge, M. (2012). Understanding regulation: theory, strategy, and practice. Oxford University Press, USA. doi. 10.1080/17449480.2013.834747

Brasil (1988). Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. Brasília, DF: Planalto. [Retrieved from].

Brasil (2022, December 26). Ministério da Fazenda. Exposição de Motivos n° 00448 EM MPV Altera a legislação do Imposto sobre a Renda das Pessoa Jurídicas - IRPJ e da Contribuição Social sobre o Lucro Líquido - CSLL para dispor sobre as regras de preços de transferência., de 28 de dezembro de 2022. Brasília, DF: Câmara dos Deputados. [Retrieved from].

Da Vitória, (2023, April 30). Parecer e Projeto de Lei de Conversão da Medida Provisória n° 1.152, de 2022 (Comissão Mista). [Retrieved from].

Epstein, D., & O’halloran, S. (1999). A transaction cost politics approach to policy making under separate powers. Cambridge: Cambridge university press. doi. 10.1017/CBO9780511609312

Grimmer, J., & Brandon M.S. (2013). Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts. In: Political Analysis 21(3), pp.267–297. doi. 10.1093/pan/mps028

Kosti, N., Levi-Faur, D., & Mor, G. (2019). Legislation and regulation: three analytical distinctions. The theory and practice of legislation, 7(3), 169-178. doi. 10.1080/20508840.2019.1736369

Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. 2014. GESIS–Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences.

Medida Provisória n° 1.152, de 28 de dezembro de 2022, (2022, December 28). Altera a legislação do Imposto sobre a Renda das Pessoa Jurídicas - IRPJ e da Contribuição Social sobre o Lucro Líquido - CSLL para dispor sobre as regras de preços de transferência. Presidência da República. [Retrieved from].

Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage publications. doi. 10.4135/9781446282243

Thomas, C.G. (2021). Research methodology and scientific writing. Thrissur: Springer. doi. 10.1007/978-3-030-64865-7

Wiener, A., & Man, E. (2019). Considering a duty to delegate in designing regulatory legislation. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 7(3), 179-203. doi. 10.1080/20508840.2020.1730103

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.