Turkish Economic Review https://journals.econsciences.com/index.php/TER <p><sup>TER (ISSN: 2149-0414) is published as four issues per year, March, June, September and December and all publication policies and processes are conducted according to the international standards. TER is an international, double-blind peer-reviewed, quarterly, open-access journal published by the Journals. TER accepts and publishes the research articles in the fields of economics, fiscal economics, applied economics, business economics, labour economics and econometrics etc. TER, without depending on any institution or organisation, is a non-profit journal that has an International Editorial Board specialists on their fields. TER is an open Access Journal. Papers which are inappropriate to its scientific purpose, scope and fields are kindly rejected. It strictly depends on the scientific principles, rules and ethical framework that are required to this qualification.</sup></p> en-US <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/" rel="license"><img style="border-width: 0;" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png" alt="Creative Commons License" /></a><br />This article licensed under <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/" rel="license"> Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (4.0)</a> journals@econsciences.com (Editorial) journals@econsciences.com (Secretarial) Sun, 10 Nov 2024 20:09:11 +0000 OJS 3.3.0.14 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Front Matter https://journals.econsciences.com/index.php/TER/article/view/2493 <p>Front Matter</p> EconSciences Library Copyright (c) 2024 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 https://journals.econsciences.com/index.php/TER/article/view/2493 Sun, 10 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0000 Beware financial conditions indicators! https://journals.econsciences.com/index.php/TER/article/view/2494 <p>This paper compares two versions of the transmission mechanism of monetary policy: the monetarist model and the widely popular Financial Conditions Index (FCI) model. The focus is on the role of interest rates and spreads as indicators of the business cycle. In the monetarist model, following a sustained upswing or downswing in the rate of growth of money, theory and evidence point to two subsequent stages for interest rates – first the liquidity effect, followed by the Fisher effect. These two movements are in opposite directions, both being effects of prior monetary growth. The first effect is typically quite brief; the latter effect usually lasts much longer. I find that the monetarist model fits the experience since March 2020 like a glove.&nbsp; By contrast, the FCI model generally ignores monetary growth and constructs an index consisting of a composite of rates, spreads and other financial market indicators. This index is taken as the driver for subsequent moves in asset prices, credit market developments and their impact on the real economy. To my knowledge, the FCI model is nowhere fully articulated and is only vaguely specified in mathematical terms. Based on evidence from business cycle developments since the onset of Covid for the US, the euro-area, and the UK, the FCI results are shown to be inconsistent and sometimes contradictory.</p> <p><strong>Keywords.</strong> Monetary economics; Business cycle; Interest rates; Inflation.</p> <p><strong>JEL. </strong>E19, E32, E52, G10.</p> John GREENWOOD Copyright (c) 2024 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 https://journals.econsciences.com/index.php/TER/article/view/2494 Sun, 10 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0000 Explicative determinants of real exchange rate volatility in Morocco: An econometric approach https://journals.econsciences.com/index.php/TER/article/view/2495 <p>This paper aims to present a theoretical framework regarding the determinants of Moroccan Real Effective Exchange Rate (REER) volatility and to define the influential factors affecting it for the Moroccan economy between 1980 and 2020. This objective is primarily motivated by the recent changes adopted by Moroccan authorities towards a flexible exchange rate regime, which includes a progressive widening of the fluctuation range of the exchange rate. In this study, we used a GARCH(1,1) model and applied an Error Correction Model (ECM) with an estimation of the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach. We found strong evidence that, in the long run, foreign direct investments, commercial openness, and terms of trade have a statistically significant negative impact on the volatility of the Moroccan REER, while the latter has a positive influence. Additionally, external debt, public expenditure, and the applied exchange rate regime positively affect REER volatility; in other words, they contribute to increased volatility in the foreign exchange market and the Moroccan economy. Conversely, the money supply has a negative impact, and the inflation rate has a positive effect on the studied volatility; however, these last results are not statistically significant.</p> <p><strong>Keywords.</strong> Real Effective Exchange Rate; Exchange Rate Volatility; GARCH Model; Error Correction Model; ARDL; Monetary Policy.</p> <p><strong>JEL. </strong>F31, F41, C22, C53, E52, C32.</p> Issam BOUSALAM , Ahmed KHATTAB, Yahya SALMI Copyright (c) 2024 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 https://journals.econsciences.com/index.php/TER/article/view/2495 Sun, 10 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0000 Is American manufacturing in decline? https://journals.econsciences.com/index.php/TER/article/view/2496 <p>There is a widespread popular view that American manufacturing is in decline. This declinist view reflects many factors. First, real GDP growth during the current business expansion has been the weakest in the post-WWII period. Second, over the decade from 2000 to 2010, manufacturing employment has declined by about 6 million. Third, persistent manufacturing trade deficits have led many observers to conclude U.S. competitiveness has eroded. This paper discusses these arguments and suggests a competing view that, instead, U.S. manufacturing is a leading growth sector and has remained strongly competitive internationally. On balance, we show that traditional domestic economic forces adequately explain recent trends in U.S. manufacturing output and employment growth. Finally, we argue that the recent reduction in the corporate income tax rate may further boost the fortunes of the U.S. manufacturing sector, although this favorable development could be offset by a more restrictive international trade regime.</p> <p><strong>Keywords.</strong> Real Effective Exchange Rate; Exchange Rate Volatility; GARCH Model; Error Correction Model; ARDL; Monetary Policy.</p> <p><strong>JEL. </strong>F31, F41, C22, C53, E52, C32.</p> Kevin L. KLIESEN , John A. TATOM Copyright (c) 2024 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 https://journals.econsciences.com/index.php/TER/article/view/2496 Sun, 10 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0000