Competitive Dynamics of Artificial Intelligence Economy: The Wicked Problem of Cognitive Competition
PDF

Keywords

Artificial intelligence

Cognitive competition
Business strategy
Autonomous agents.

How to Cite

NAQVI, A. (2017). Competitive Dynamics of Artificial Intelligence Economy: The Wicked Problem of Cognitive Competition. Journal of Economics Library, 4(2), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1453/jel.v4i2.1319

Abstract

Abstract. The competitive dynamics of the early 21st century competition are being reshaped. Much has changed in recent years as the rise of artificial intelligence is emerging as a powerful force. Less understood, but overwhelmingly felt, the change is shattering the traditional vertical boundaries. With tech firms now encroaching the traditional verticals, the need for strategic realignment is apparent. Non-tech firms are responding with acquiring tech firms. Tech firms are responding with trespassing into the non-tech domains. This creates a wicked problem for traditional non-tech firms: traditional sellers of technology are now becoming fierce competitors andtraditional non-tech firms must adapt to this new reality by developing technology of their own. This paper adds to the literature in various ways. First, the paper presents a model that captures the unique properties of artificial intelligence competition. Second, the paper argues that to stay competitive non-tech firms would need to acquire multidisciplinary innovation capability as well as embrace high-performance innovation culture.

Keywords. Artificial intelligence, Cognitive competition, Business strategy, Autonomous agents.

JEL. O00, O30, M00, M10, L00, L10.

https://doi.org/10.1453/jel.v4i2.1319
PDF

References

Abrahamson, E. (1991). Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and refection of innovations. Academy of Management Review. 16(3), 586–612. doi. 10.5465/AMR.1991.4279484

Abrahamson, E., & Fairchild, G. (1999). Management fashion: Lifecycles, triggers, and collective learning processes. Adminstrative Science Quarterly. 44(4), 708–740. doi. 10.2307/2667053

Abrahamson, E., & Rosenkopf, L. (1993) Institutional and competitive bandwagons: Using mathematical modeling as a tool to explore innovation diffusion. Academy of Management Review. 18(3), 487-517. doi. 10.2307/258906

Albert, S., & Whetten, D.A. (1985). Organizational identity’ research in organizational behavior. L.L. Cummings & B.M. Staw (Eds.). Greenwich: JAI Press.

Balmer, J.M.T., & Greyser, S.A. (2002). Managing the multiple identities of the corporation. California Management Review. 44(3), 72–86.

Baskerville, R. Bunker, D., Olaisen, J., Pries-Heje, J., Larsen, T.J., & Swanson, E.B. (2014). Diffusion and innovation theory: Past, present, and future contributions to academia and practice. IFIP WG 8.6 International Conference on Transfer and Diffusion of IT. 295–300. doi. 10.1007/978-3-662-43459-8_18

Bezrukova, K., Thatcher, S.M.B., Jehn, K.A., & Spell, C.S. (2012). The effects of alignments: Examining group faultlines, organizational cultures, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology. 97(1), 77–92. doi. 10.1037/a0023684

Bierwerth, M., Schwens, C., Isidor, R., & Kabst, R. (2015) Corporate entrepreneurship and performance: A meta-analysis. Small Business Economics, 45(2), 255-278. doi. 10.1007/s11187-015-9629-1

Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2011) Race Against the Machine : How the digital revolution is accelerating innovation, driving productivity, and irreversibly transforming employment and the economy. Lexington: Digital Frontier Press.

Camillus, J. C. (2008) Strategy as a wicked problem. Harvard Business Review. (May), 1–10.

Chatman, J.A, Caldwell, D.F., O'Reilly, C.A., & Doer, B. (2014) Parsing organizational culture: How the norm for adaptability influences the relationship between culture consensus and financial performance in high-technology firms. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 35(6), 785–808. doi. 10.1002/job.1928

Churchman, C.W. (1967) Guest Editorial : Wicked Problems. 14(4), B141–B142.

Cornelissen, J.P., Haslam, S.A., & Balmer, J.M.T. (2007) Social identity, organizational identity and corporate identity: Towards an integrated understanding of processes, patternings and products. British Journal of Management. 18(S1), S1-S16. doi. 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00522.x

Deserti, A., & Rizzo, F. (2014) Design and the cultures of enterprises. Design MIT. 30(1), 36–56. doi. 10.1162/DESI_a_00247

DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. (1983). The iron cage revisited : Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review. 48(2), 147-160.

Franklin, S., & Graesser, A. (1997). Is it an agent, or just a program?: A taxonomy for autonomous Agents in R. Nicholas, J.P. Jörg, M.J. Wooldridge, N.R. Jennings (Eds.).Agents intelligent agent III. (pp.21-35), Berlin: Springer Verlag. doi. 10.1007/BFb0013570

Frey, C.B., & Osborne, M.A. (2013). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Oxford Martin School Working Paper. [Retrieved from].

Hannan, M., & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational Ecology. Harvard University Press.

Hannan, M.T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology. 82(5), 929–964.

Hawley, A. (1968). Human ecology. D.L. Sills (Ed.). International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences , New York: Macmillan.

Hirschheim, R., Murungi, D.M., & Pena, S. (2012). Witty invention or dubious fad? Using argument mapping to examine the contours of management fashion. Information and Organization. 22(1), 60-84. doi. 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2011.11.001

Hoholm, T. & Strønen, F.H. (2011). Innovation, strategy and identity: a case study from the food industry. European Journal of Innovation Management. 14(3), 345–363. doi. 10.1108/14601061111148834

Insights, C. (2016). Artificial Intelligence Explodes: New Deal Activity Record For AI Startups Accessed 21 June 2017. [Retrieved from].

Jung, T. Scott, T., Davies, H.T.O., Bower, P., Whalley, D., McNally, R., & Mannion, R. (2003). Instruments for exploring organizational culture: A review of the literature. Public Administration Review. 69(9), 1087-1096. doi. 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02066.x

Makridakis, S. (2017). The forthcoming artificial intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms. Futures. 90, 46-60. doi. 10.1016/j.futures.2017.03.006

McAfee, A., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2016). Human work in the robotic future. Foreign Affairs. 95(4), 139-150. [Retrieved from].

Picker, L. (2017). For non-tech companies, if you can’t build it, buy a start-up, Accessed 21 June 2017, [Retrieved from].

Porter, M.E., & Heppelmann, J.E. (2015). How smart, connected products are transforming companies. Harvard Business Review, [Retrieved from].

Rittel, H.W.J., & Webber, M.M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences. 4(2), 155-169. doi. 10.1007/BF01405730

Sørensen, J.B. (2002). The strength of corporate culture and the reliability of firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly. 47(1), 70-91. doi. 10.2307/3094891

Tellis, G.J., Prabhu, J.C., Sethi, R., & Chandy, K. (2009). Radical innovation across nations: The preeminence of corporate culture. Journal of Marketing. 73(1), 3-23. doi. 10.1509/jmkg.73.1.3

Vlasic, B. (2017). As Profit Dwindles, Ford Is Said to Replace Its C.E.O. The New York Times. 21 May. [Retrieved from].

Whetten, D.A. (2006). Albert and Whetten revisited: Strengthening the concept of organizational identity. Journal of Management Inquiry. 15(3), 219-234. doi. 10.1177/1056492606291200

White House, (2016a). Artificial Intelligence, Automation, and the Economy. [Retrieved from].

White House, (2016b). Preparing for the future of Artificial Intelligence. [Retrieved from].

Creative Commons License
This article licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (4.0)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.