Abstract
Abstract. The capability approach has been made operable and an example is the Human Development Index and the Multidimensional Poverty Index (Dotter & Klasen, 2014). However, its operable nature in the field of evaluation of specific dimension such as education, gender and poverty from a diffuse perspective is even broader (Addabbo, Di Tommaso & Facchinetti, 2004; Martinetti, 2006; Addabbo & Facchinetti, 2013). In this sense, this article aims to provide a very brief formal aproximation to the capability approach, mainly focusing on some their fundamental concepts.
Keywords. Capability approach, Functioning, Amartya Sen.
JEL. I31, I32, D63.
References
Addabbo, T., & Facchinetti, G. (2013). The fuzzy logic and the capability approach. CAP Paper, No.106.
Addabbo, T., Di Tommaso, M.L., & Facchinetti, G. (2004). To what extent fuzzy set theory and structural equation modelling can measure functionings? An application to child well being. Materiali di Discussione del Dipartimento di Economia Politica, No.468. [Retrieved from].
Alkire, S. (2005). Measuring the freedom aspects of capabilities'. Unpublished Paper. [Retrieved from].
Alkire, S. (2010). Human development: Definitions, critiques, and related concepts. OPHI Working Paper, No. 36. [Retrieved from].
Clark, D.A. (2005). The capability approach: Its development, critiques and recent advances. GPRG Working Paper, No.36. [Retrieved from].
Deneulin, S. (2011). Advancing human development: Values, groups, power and conflict. In V. FitzGerald, H. Heyer, & R. Thorp (Eds.), Overcoming the persistence of inequality and poverty, (pp.127-148). Soringer. doi. 10.1057/9780230306721_6
Deneulin, S., & Shahani, L. (Eds.). (2009). An introduction to the human development and capability approach: Freedom and agency. IDRC.
Dotter, C., & Klasen, S. (2014). The Multidimensional Poverty Index: achievements, conceptual and empirical issues. Human Development Report Office Occasional Paper. [Retrieved from].
Ege, R., Igersheim, H., & Le Chapelain, C. (2016). Transcendental vs. comparative approaches to justice: a reappraisal of Sen's dichotomy. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 23(4), 521-543. doi. 10.1080/09672567.2014.916734
Gandjour, A. (2008). Mutual dependency between capabilities and functionings in Amartya Sen’s capability approach. Social Choice and Welfare, 31(2), 345-350. doi. 10.1007/s00355-007-0283-7
Harsanyi, J.C. (1996). Funciones no lineales de bienestar social: ¿tienen los economistas del bienestar una exención especial de la racionalidad bayesiana? Télos, 5(1), 55-78.
Kaushik, B., & López-Calva, L.F. (2011). Chapter Sixteen-Functionings and Capabilities. Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, 2, 153-187. doi. 10.1016/S0169-7218(10)00016-X
Martinetti, E.C. (2006). Capability approach and fuzzy set theory: description, aggregation and inference issues. In Fuzzy set approach to multidimensional poverty measurement (pp. 93-113). Springer US.
Nussbaum, M. (2002). Capabilities and social justice. International Studies Review, 4(2), 123-135. doi. 10.1111/1521-9488.00258
Nussbaum, M.C. (1992). Human functioning and social justice: In defense of Aristotelian essentialism. Political theory, 20(2), 202-246. doi. 10.1177/0090591792020002002
Nussbaum, M.C. (2004). Beyond the social contract: capabilities and global justice. An Olaf Palme lecture, delivered in Oxford on 19 June 2003. Oxford Development Studies, 32(1), 3-18. doi. 10.1080/1360081042000184093
Nussbaum, M.C. (2009). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Harvard University Press.
Pogge, T., & Álvarez, D. (2010). Justicia global: dos enfoques. Isegoría, 43, 573-588.
Robeyns, I. (2000). An unworkable idea or a promising alternative? Sen's capability approach re-examined. [Retrieved from].
Robeyns, I. (2003). The capability approach: an interdisciplinary introduction. In Training course preceding the Third International Conference on the Capability Approach, Pavia, Italy. [Retrieved from].
Robeyns, I. (2005). Sen‘s Capability Approach and Gender Inequality: Selecting Relevant Capabilities. Feminist Economics, 9(2-3), 61-92. doi. 10.1080/1354570022000078024
Robeyns, I. (2011). The capability approach. in J. Peil, I.v. Staveren (Eds.), Handbook of Economics and Ethics, Edward Elgar.
Robeyns, I. (2016). Capabilitarianism. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 17(3), 397-414. doi. 10.1080/19452829.2016.1145631
Sen, A. (1981). Poverty and famines: an essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. (1988). Freedom of choice: concept and content. European Economic Review, 32(2-3), 269-294. doi. 10.1016/0014-2921(88)90173-0
Sen, A. (1989). Food and freedom. World Development, 17(6), 769-781. doi. 10.1016/0305-750X(89)90001-6
Sen, A. (1993). Capability and Well-Being73. The Quality of Life, 30. doi. 10.1093/0198287976.003.0005
Sen, A. (1995). Nuevo examen de la desigualdad. Madrid: Alianza.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. (2001). Propiedad y hambre. Precedente. Revista Jurídica, 103-113. doi. 10.18046/prec.v0.1384
Sen, A. (2008). Bienestar, justicia y mercado. Barcelona, Ediciones Paidós Ibérica, S.A. Traducción Damián.
Sen, A. (2008a). Sobre Ética y Economía. Madrid, Alianza Editorial. Traducción Ángeles Conde
Sen, A. (2011). The Idea of Justice. Harvard University Press.
Sen, A.K. (1996). Desigualdades de bienestar y axiomática rawlsiana. Télos, 5(1).
Sen, A.K. (2003). La libertad individual como compromiso social. Plural editores.
Williams, B. (2003). Crítica al enfoque de las capacidades y realizaciones de Amartya Sen. Comercio Exterior, 5(5), 424-426.
