Abstract
Abstract. This paper revisits the standard multiplier-accelerator model, as advanced by Samuelson. While borrowing on the main assumptions of the multiplier-accelerator, we check the validity of Keynesian theory. Using higher-order difference equations and advanced-level mathematical techniques we solve the tax-augmented multiplier-accelerator model, as well as the open economy one. We find that the values of equilibrium national income are identical to the simple national-income model in the absence of the accelerator. We solve the simple multiplier-accelerator model both in present terms and withprolonged consumption. We solve for equilibrium consumption, tax, and imports which are unaffected by the accelerator. All results conform to Keynesian theory where investment, government spending and exports have a favorable multiplying effect on national income through their respective multipliers. The accelerator coefficient affects neither those multipliers, nor the income and the non-income tax multipliers. Expanding the multiplier-accelerator by the volume of foreign trade, taxation or both does not change the values of Keynesian variables. Adding an accelerator leaves optimal values unaffected but, more importantly, reinforces Keynesian theory.
Keywords. Multiplier, Accelerator, Open economy, Difference equations, Keynesian national-income model, Tax multiplier, Exports multiplier.
JEL. E12, C02, E21, E22.
References
Bruno, M., & Sachs, J.D. (1985). Economics of Worldwide Stagflation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Devarajan, S., & Go, D.S. (1998). The simplest dynamic general-equilibriummodel of an open economy. Journal of Policy Modeling, 20(6), 677-714. doi. 10.1016/S0161-8938(98)00011-8
Friedman, M., & Schwartz, A.J. (1963). Money and business cycles. Review of Economics and Statistics, 45(2), 32-64. doi. 10.2307/1927148
Harris, R. (1984). Applied general equilibrium analysis of small open economies with scale economies and imperfect competition. American Economic Review, 74(5), 1016-1032.
Harrod, R.F. (1936).The Trade Cycle: An Essay. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Harrod, R.F. (1939). Anessay in dynamic theory. Economic Journal, 49(193), 14-33. doi. 10.2307/2225181
Matsumoto, A., & Szidarovszky, F. (2015). Nonlinear multiplier-accelerator model withinvestment and consumption delays. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 33(C), 1-9. doi. 10.1016/j.strueco.2015.01.003
Puu, T., Gardini, L., & Sushko, I. (2005). A Hicksian multiplier-accelerator model with floor determined by capital stock. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 56(3), 331-348. doi. 10.1016/j.jebo.2003.10.008
Samuelson, P.A. (1939). Interactions between the multiplier analysis and the principles ofacceleration. Review of Economic Statistics, 21(2), 75-78. doi. 10.2307/1927758
Westerhoff, F. (2006). Samuelson's multiplier-accelerator model revisited. Applied Economics Letters, 13(2), 89-92. doi. 10.1080/13504850500390663
