Egalitarianism Policy and Effective Demand under Globalization
PDF

Supplementary Files

Cover Page
Conflict
Graph
Table1
Table2

How to Cite

ABE, T. (2015). Egalitarianism Policy and Effective Demand under Globalization. Journal of Economics and Political Economy, 2(3), 374–382. https://doi.org/10.1453/jepe.v2i3.408

Abstract

Abstract. The study examines egalitarianism policies in terms of the relationship between labor and capital and extends the model developed by the economist Bowles. We introduce the demand factor to the Bowles model (2012), which discussed the effectiveness of the income and asset redistribution policies in a global economy. The improvement of productivity and the decrease in the ratio of monitoring labor through asset-based redistribution increase the real wage rate because of its lure for foreign capital. At this point in the Bowles model, the labor supply increases and then employment increases. In contrast, in our model, with the addition of the demand factor, the improvement of productivity increases employment, but the decrease in monitoring labor does not always increase employment as both demand and supply increase. This means that asset-based redistribution in a global economy is not always effective.

Keywords. Egalitarianism, Redistribution, Effective demand, Globalization.

JEL. E12, F60, J80, J88.

https://doi.org/10.1453/jepe.v2i3.408
PDF

References

Abe, T. (2014). Cyclical patterns in Japanese manufacturing firms: analyzing three post-Keynesian models. Evolutionary and Institutional Economic Review, 11 (1), 1-18. doi: 10.14441/eier.110101

Abe, T. (2013). Estimation of the Kaleckian investment function in Japanese manufacturing. Post Keynesian Review, 2(1), 29-38.

Blecker, R. (1998). International competitiveness, relative wages, and the balance-of-payments constraint. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 20(4), 495-526.

Blecker, R. (1989). International competition, income distribution and economic growth. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 13(3), 395-412.

Bowles, S. (2013). Three's a Crowd: My Dinner Party with Karl, Leon, and Maynard. In J. Wicks-Lim and R. Pollin (Eds.), Capitalism on Trial: Explorations in the tradition of Thomas E. Weisskoph (pp.17-41). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

Bowles, S. (2012). Feasible egalitarianism in a competitive world. In The New Economics of Inequality and Redistribution (pp.73-100). New York, Cambridge University Press.

Bowles, S., & Boyer, R. (1995). Wages, Aggregate Demand, and Employment in an Open Economy: An Empirical Investigation. In G. Epstain and H. Gintis (Eds.), Macroeconomic Policy after the Conservative Era (pp.143-171). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Bowles, S., & Boyer, R. (1988). Labor discipline and aggregate demand: A macroeconomic model. American Economic Review, 78(2), 395-400.

Hein, E., Lavoie, M., & van Treeck, T. (2011). Some instability puzzles in Kaleckian models of growth and distribution: A critical survey. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35(3), 587-612. doi: 10.1093/cje/beq026

Lavoie, M., & Stockhammer, E. (2012). Wage-led growth: Concept, theories and policies. Conditions of Work and Employment Series, No.41, International Labour Office.

Nakatani, T. (2012), Significance of post-Keynesian economics: Kaleckian-Steindl proposition and its extension to open wage-led economies. Post Keynesian Review, 1(1), 17-37.

Nakatani, T. (2008). International competition and Steindl proposition.Journal of Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University, 197(1), 51-64 (in Japanese).

Picketty, T. (2013). it Le Capital au XXIesie ̀cle.Seuil.

Shimano, N. (2015). An empirical analysis of the effect of financialization on capital accumulation in Japan: From the viewpoint of the spread of shareholder value orientation in Japanese firms. Political Economy Quarterly, 51 (4), 70-82 (in Japanese).

Skott, P. (2012). Theoretical and empirical shortcomings of the Kaleckian investment function. Metroeconomica, 63 (1), 109-138. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-999X.2010.04111.x

Skott, P. & Zipperer, B. (2012). An empirical evaluation of three post Keynesian models. Intervention: European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies, 9 (2), 277-308. doi: 10.4337/ejeep.2012.02.09

Creative Commons License
This article licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (4.0)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.