Monopoly Capital and Capitalist Inequality: Marx after Piketty
PDF

Keywords

Alienation
Economics
Fascism
Inequality
Monopoly capital
Occupy movement
Political science
Socialism
Tea Party

How to Cite

LAMBERT, T. E. (2016). Monopoly Capital and Capitalist Inequality: Marx after Piketty. Journal of Economics and Political Economy, 3(1), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1453/jepe.v3i1.687

Abstract

Abstract. This paper proposes that one major explanation of growing inequality in the United States (US) is through the use of the concept of economic surplus. The economic surplus is a neo-Marxian term which combines the traditional Marxian tenet of surplus value with other ways that surplus value can be invested in a mature, advanced capitalist economy. A rising economic surplus that is not absorbed through growing consumer spending, luxury spending or government spending results in stagnant wages and growing inequality via higher levels of underemployment and greater monopoly and monopsony power among a decreasing number of huge, powerful corporations. Therefore, the politics surrounding the growth of inequality in the US has to be understood first by understanding over accumulation of the economic surplus by those at the top of the US capitalist class.  This research note gives estimates of the rising economic surplus over the last several decades in the US as well as how these correlate with the level of inequality. The growth of the economic surplus gives rise and form to the politics of inequality and austerity.  As time goes by, the politics of inequality and austerity in the US will be manifested by greater corporate influence in the political system, greater political polarization, less government effectiveness, and more debates about welfare spending, corporate taxation, taxes on upper income households, and taxes on wealth.

Keywords. Alienation, Fascism, Inequality, Monopoly capital, Occupy movement, Political science, Socialism, Tea Party.

JEL. D63, P10, P16, P40.
https://doi.org/10.1453/jepe.v3i1.687
PDF

References

Alvaredo, F., Atkinson, T., Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2016). World Wealth and Income Database. http://www.wid.world/#Home (Accessed on January 22).

Amin, S. (2014). The Return of Fascism in Contemporary Capitalism, Monthly Review, September, 66(04).

Andrews, C. (2014). Professor Piketty Fights Orthodoxy and Attacks Inequality, Marxism-Leninism Today. http://mltoday.com/professor-piketty-fights-orthodoxy-and-attacks-inequality Accessed on January 10, 2016.

Baran, P.A., & Sweezy, P.M. (1966). Monopoly Capital:An Essay on the American Economic and Social Order. New York: Monthly Review Press.

Carsten, F.L. (1980). The Rise of Fascism, Second Edition. University of California Press: Berkeley and Los Angeles.

Collins, J.C. (2001). Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap and Others Do Not. New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishers Inc.

Chemi, E., & Giorgi, A. (2014). The Pay-for-Performance Myth, Bloomberg Business. July 22, 2014. http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/articles/2014-07-22/for-ceos-correlation-between-pay-and-stock-performance-is-pretty-random . Accessed on January 8, 2016.

Chokshi, N. (2016). The Year of ‘Enormous Rage’: Number of Hate Groups Rose by 14 Percent in 2015”, The Washington Post, February 17.

Feldstein, M. (1999). Reducing Poverty, Not Inequality. The Public Interest, Number 137, Fall 1999. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Foster, J.B. (2014). The Theory of Monopoly Capitalism, Second Edition. New York: Monthly Review Press.

Foster, J.B., & Magdoff, F. (2009). The great financial crisis: Causes and consequences. New York: Monthly Review Press.

Foster, J.B. & Yates, M.D. (2014). Piketty and the Crisis of Neoclassical Economics, Monthly Review, 66(6), 1-24.

Goo, S.K. (2015). What Americans want to do about illegal immigration, Pew Research Center, Fact-tank. August 24.

Greenhouse, S., & Leonhard, D. (2006). Real wages fail to match a rise in productivity. The New York Times, August 28.

Houston, D. (1997). Productive-unproductive labor: rest in peace, Review of Radical Political Economics, 29(1), 131-139. doi. 10.1177/048661349702900102

Laibman, D. (1999). Productive and unproductive labor: A comment, Review of Radical Political Economics, 31(2), 61-73. doi. 10.1177/048661349903100204

Lambert, T.E. (2011). Falling income and debt: Comparing views of a major cause of the Great Recession. World Review of Political Economy, 2(2), 247-261.

Lambert, T.E. & Kwon, E. (2015a). The top 1 percent and exploitation measures, Review of Radical Political Economics, 47(3): 465-476. doi. 10.1177/0486613414542781

Lambert, T.E. & Kwon, E. (2015b). Monopoly Capital and Capitalist Inefficiency, International Review of Applied Economics., 29(4), 533-552. doi. 10.1080/02692171.2015.1016409

Mongiovi, G. (2015). Piketty on capitalism and inequality: A radical economics perspective, Review of Radical Economists, 47(4), 558-565. doi. 10.1177/0486613415584580

Mohun, S. (1996). Productive and unproductive labor in the labor theory of value, Review of Radical Political Economics, 28(4), 30–54. doi. 10.1177/048661349602800402

Mohun, S. (2014). Unproductive labor in the U.S. economy, 1964-2010, Review of Radical Political Economics, 46(3): 355-379.

Newman, B.J., Johnston, C.D., & Lown, P.L. (2015). False consciousness or class awareness? Local income inequality, personal economic position, and belief in American meritocracy, American Journal of Political Science, 59(2), 326-340. doi. 10.1111/ajps.12153

Newport, F. (2015). Americans Continue to Say U.S. Wealth Distribution Is Unfair”, Gallup Poll. May 4.

O’Connor, J. (1973). The Fiscal Crisis of the State. St. Martin’s Press: New York.

Patnaik, P. (2016). Capitalism and its current crisis, Monthly Review, 67(8) January: 1-13.

Piketty, T. (2014). Le capital au XXIe siècle. Paris: Seuil

Renton, D. (1999). Fascism: Theory and Practice. London: Pluto Press: eBook Collection.

Sabine, G.H., & Thorson, T.L. (1973). A History of Political Theory, Fourth Edition. Dryden Press: Hinsdale, Illinois.

Shaikh, A., & Tonak, E.A. (1994). Measuring the Wealth of Nations: The Political Economy of National Accounts. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Solt, F. (2008). Economic inequality and democratic political engagement, American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 48-60. doi. 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00298.x

Studenmund, A. H. (2006). Using Econometrics: A Practical Guide, 5th Edition. Pearson Education, Addison-Wesley: Boston, Massachusetts

Sweezy, P.M. (1942). The Theory of Capitalist Development: Principles of Marxian Political Economy. New York and London: Modern Reader Paperbacks and Monthly Review Press.

Talbot, M. (2015). The populist prophet, The New Yorker. October 20.

U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. 2016. GDP and NIPA accounts. Available at http://www.bea.gov/national/index.htm#gdp.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2012. Labor force statistics. Available at http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpslutabs.

Wolff, Edward N. 1987. Growth, Accumulation, and Unproductive Activity: An Analysis of the Postwar U.S. Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Creative Commons License
This article licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (4.0)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.