Abstract
Abstract. The efficient market hypothesis has been around since 1962, the theory is based on a simple rule, namely that the price of any asset must fully reflect all available information.Yet there is empirical evidence financial markets are too volatile to be efficient. The empirical evidence suggests that the reaction to events is the crucial factor, rather than the actual information. Generally, market participants react differently to negative and positive market shocks, hinting at asymmetrical effects. This paperanalyses the impact of asymmetrical effects on the efficiency of the financial market during the recent crises. We test the efficiency of the financial markets using the daily prices of the GIPS sovereign debts between June 2007 and December 2011. This allowed us to test the efficiency during the financial crisis and sovereign debt crisis periods. We used a GJR-GARCH based variance bound test based on the test derived by Fakhry & Richter (2015). Our tests provide evidence forfinancial markets being too volatile to be efficient. At the same time, the results are pointing towards bounded rationality rather than irrationality.
Keywords. Efficient market hypothesis, Volatility tests, Asymmetrical effect, GJR-GARCH, Sovereign debt market, Crises.
JEL. B23, C12, C13, C58, G01, G14, G15, H63.References
Alexander, C. (2008). Introduction to GARCH Models, in Market Risk Analysis, Vol. 2: Practical Financial Econometrics, C. Alexander (Edt), John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp.131-199.
Ball, R. (2009), The global financial crisis and the efficient market hypothesis: What have WE learnt?, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 21(4), 8-16. doi. 10.1111/j.1745-6622.2009.00246.x
Black, F. (1976). Studies of stock market volatility changes, Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section, American Statistical Association pp. 177–181.
Bollerslev, T. & Hodrick, R.J. (1992). Financial Market Efficiency Tests, NBER, Working Paper No. 4108. doi. 10.3386/w4108
Cajueiro, D.O., Gogas, P., & Tabak, B.M. (2009). Does financial market liberalization increase the degree of market efficiency? The case of the Athens stock exchange, International Review of Financial Analysis, 18(1-2), 50–57. doi. 10.1016/j.irfa.2008.11.004
Cuthbertson, K., & Hyde, S. (2002), Excess volatility and efficiency in French and German stock markets, Economic Modelling, 19(3), 399-418. doi. 10.1016/S0264-9993(01)00069-4
Dungey, M., McKenzie, M., & Tambakis, D.N. (2009). Flight-to-quality and asymmetric volatility responses in US treasuries, Global Finance Journal, 19(3), 252-267. doi. 10.1016/j.gfj.2008.09.008
Engle, R.F., & Patton, A.J. (2001). What good is a volatility model?, Quantitative Finance, 1(2), 237-245. doi. 10.1016/B978-075066942-9.50004-2
Fakhry, B., & Richter, C. (2015). Is the sovereign debt market efficient? Evidence from the US and German Sovereign Debt Markets, International Economics and Economic Policy, 12(3), 339-357. doi. 10.1007/s10368-014-0304-9
Fakhry, B., Masood, O., & Bellalah, M. (2016). The efficiency of the GIPS sovereign debt markets during the Crisis, International Journal of Business, 21(1), 87-98.
Fama, E.F. (1965). Random walks in stock market prices, Financial Analyst Journal, 21(5), 55-59. doi. 10.2469/faj.v21.n5.55
Fama, E.F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work, The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417. doi. 10.2307/2325486
Fama, E.F. (1991). Efficient capital markets: II, The Journal of Finance, 46(5), 1575-1617. doi. 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04636.x
Glosten, L.R., Jagannathan, R., & Runkle, D.E. (1993). On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess returns on stocks, Journal of Finance, 48(5), 1779-1801. doi. 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05128.x
Kirchler, M. (2009). Underreaction to fundamental information and asymmetry in mispricing between bullish and bearish markets. An experimental study, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 33(2), 491-506. doi. 10.1016/j.jedc.2008.08.002
LeRoy, S.F. (1989). Efficient capital markets and martingales, Journal of Economic Literature, 27(4), 1583-1621.
LeRoy, S.F., & Porter, R.D. (1981). The present-value relation: Tests based on implied variance bounds, Econometrica, 49(3), 555-574. doi. 10.2307/1911512
Lo, A.W., & MacKinlay, C. (1988). Stock market prices do not follow random walks: Evidence from a simple specification test, The Review of Financial Studies, 1(1), 41-66. doi. 10.1093/rfs/1.1.41
Malkiel, B.G. (1962). Expectations, bond prices, and the term structure of interest rates, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 76(2), 197-218. doi. 10.2307/1880816
Metiu, N. (2011). The EMU in debt bistress: Contagion in sovereign bond market, European Economic Association & Econometric Society 2011 Parallel Meetings, Oslo, 25-29 August 2011
Mohl, P., & Sondermann, D. (2013). Has political communication during the crisis impacted sovereign bond spreads in the euro area?, Applied Economics Letters, 20(1), 48-61. doi. 10.1080/13504851.2012.674201
Nelson, D.B. (1991), Conditional heteroscedasticity in asset returns: A new approach, Econometrica, 59(2), 347-370. doi. 10.2307/2938260
Shiller, R.J. (1979). The volatility of long-term interest rates and expectations models of the term structure, The Journal of Political Economy, 87(6), 1190-1219. doi. 10.1086/260832
Shiller, R.J. (1981a). The use of volatility measures in assessing market efficiency, The Journal of Finance, 36(2), 291-304. doi. 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981.tb00441.x
Shiller, R.J. (1981b). Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in dividends?, The American Economic Review, 71(3), 421-436.
Shiller, R.J. (1992). Market Volatility, Cambridge (Massachusetts): MIT Press
Tamakoshi, G. (2011). European sovereign debt crisis and linkage of long-term government bond yields, Economic Bulletin, 31(3), 2191-2203.
Zakoian, J.M. (1994). Threshold heteroskedastic models, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Controls, 18(5), 931-955. doi. 10.1016/0165-1889(94)90039-6
Zunino, L., Bariviera, A.F., Guercio, M.B., Martinez, L.B., & Rosso, O.A. (2012). On the efficiency of sovereign bond markets, Physica A, 391(18), 4342-4349. doi. 10.1016/j.physa.2012.04.009
