The Europranization of national Foreign Policies: The Examples og germany and France within the Framework of Ukraine Crisis
PDF

How to Cite

UĞUR, Ömer. (2016). The Europranization of national Foreign Policies: The Examples og germany and France within the Framework of Ukraine Crisis. Turkish Economic Review, 3(3), 527–536. https://doi.org/10.1453/ter.v3i3.1028

Abstract

Abstract. This study aims to investigate the effects of foreign policy cooperation processes laid down at European Union (EU) level on national foreign policies. Vast majority of the current literature on European integration focus on the impacts of developments at EU level, supra-national institutionalization and policy-making processes on member states. However, as the domain of foreign policy, which has been included within the institutional framework of the EU with the Maastricht Treaty, is under the control of member states, it has been excluded from these investigations for a long time. Even though the foreign policy of EU has an intergovernmental character, the expansion of the foreign policy domain and the development of institutional structures after the adoption of the Maastricht Treaty have introduced considerable changes in the national foreign policies of member states. In this context, the main problematic of this study is to examine how and in what ways EU foreign policy, which was designed to be under the control of member states as a result of concerns related with sovereignty, unveil the changes in member states’ foreign policies. Providing an explanation for this problematic has become significant as national foreign policies have increasingly become the subject matter of foreign policy-making at EU level after the adoption of the Maastricht Treaty. In order to account for this problematic, the concept of Europeanization, which examines the effects of the EU integration processes and developments on member states and suggests a different approach to the European integration, was employed. Moreover, this study addressed the Ukraine crisis, which posed a considerable threat to European peace and stability in the post-Cold War era, as a case study. The changes in the national foreign policies of two prominent members of the European Union, Germany and France, towards Russia within the course of Ukraine crisis were also examined in the context of the Europeanization concept. Consequently, it is seen that constant participation of member states in the foreign policy-making processes at EU level initiates significant changes in member states’ national foreign policies, even though it cannot cause a transformation of national foreign policies. While such change assists the growth of institutional structures at EU level, it also enables more binding decisions to be made for the Europeanization of member states’ national foreign policies. Thereby, national foreign policies of member states become more likely to be influenced by the foreign policy at EU level.

Keywords. European Union Foreign Policy, The Europeanization, Ukraine Crisis, National Foreign Policy.

JEL. F51, F55.

https://doi.org/10.1453/ter.v3i3.1028
PDF

References

Adomeit, H. (2015). German-Russian Relations: Change of Paradigm versus Businnes as Usual. Notes du Cerfa, Paris http://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/ndc_120_adomeit_en_0.pdf adresinden 23/12/2015 tarihinde alındı.

Agadzhanyan, M. (2012). Russıa-France: Balance Of Economy And Policy. Eurodialogue http://Www.Eurodialogue.Eu/Russia-France-Balance-Of-Economy-And-Policyadresinden 14/01/2016 tarihinde alındı.

Akşit, S., Şenyuva, Ö. & Üstün, Ç. (2009). Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinden Türkiye'nin Üyeliğine Bakış. Ankara: Avrupa Çalışmaları Merkezi.

Aktipis, M. & Oliver, T. (2012). Europeanization and British foreign policy. İçinde, R. Wong & C. Hill (Eds.), National and European Foreign Policy: Towards Europeanization (ss. 72-92). Oxon: Routledge.

Allen, D. (1998). Who Speaks for Europe?: The Search for an Effective and Coherent External Policy. İçinde, J. Peterson & H. Sjursen (Eds.), A Common Foreign Policy for Europe (ss. 18–38). London: Routledge.

Allen, D. & Oliver, T. (2006). The Foreign Policy. İçinde, I. Bache & A. Jordan (Eds.), The Europeanization of British Politics (ss. 52-56). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Arı, T. (2011). Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Dış Politika. Bursa: MKM Yayıncılık.

Arman, M. R. & Aslan, H. (2015). Avrupa Komşuluk Politikası Çerçevesinde Ukrayna Krizi, İçinde, U. B. Yıldız (Ed.), Avrupa Birliği’nin Dış İlişkileri: Bölgesel Politikalar, Bölgeler ve Uluslararası Aktörlerle İlişkiler (ss. 59-82).Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.

Börzel, T. A. (2005). Europeanization: How the European Union Interacts with its Member States. İçinde, S. Bulmer & C. Lequesne (Eds.), The Member States of the European Union (ss. 45-76), Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

Bache, I. & Jordan, A. (2008). Europeanization and Domestic Change. İçinde, I. Bache & A. Jordan (Eds.). The Europeanization of British Politics (ss. 3-33). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Barbé, E. (2011). Spain and Europe: Mutual reinforcement in foreign policy. İçinde, C. Hıll &. R. Wong (Eds.). National and European Foreign Policy: Towards Europeanizations (ss. 131-148), Oxon: Routledge.

Baun, M. J. & Marek, D. (2013). The new member states and the European Union: foreign policy and Europeanization. Oxon: Routledge.

Baykal, S. (2006). 1999 Helsinki’den 2004 Brüksel’e -Mukadder Üyelikten Ucu Açık Müzakerelere: Türkiye AB İlişkileri. İçinde M. Aydın & Ç. Erhan (Eds). Beş Deniz Havzasında Türkiye (ss. 137- 189), Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.

BBC, (2015). France Seeks End to Russia Sanctions over Ukraine. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-30679176 adresinden 16/02/2016 tarihinde alındı.

BBC, (2015). Ukraine conflict: France hopes to end Russia sanctions. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34174382 adresinden 17/02/2016 tarihinde alındı.

BBC, (2015). Ukrayna Kriz Zirvesi Öncesinde Kim Ne İstiyor? http://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler/2015/02/150211_minsk_pozisyonlaradresinden10/01/2016 tarihinde alındı.

Bechev, D. (2009). From policy-takers to policy-makers? Observations on Bulgarian and Romanian foreign policy before and after EU Accession.Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 10(2), 210-224.

Beste, R., Feldenkirchen, M. & Szandar, A.(2008). Germany and the Caucasus Conflict: Merkel’s Most Serious Foreign Policy Crisis. Der Spiegel Online. http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/germany-and-the-caucasus-conflict-merkel-s-most-serious-foreign-policy-crisis-a-572726.html adresinden 12/03/2016 tarihinde alındı.

Bindi, F. (Ed.) (2010). The foreign policy of the European Union: assessing Europe's role in the world. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Bomberg, E. & Peterson J. (2000). Policy Transfer and Europeanisation: Passing the Heineken test?, paper presented at the PSA Annual Conference, 10-13 April, London.

Börzel, T. & Risse, T. (2003). Conceptualizing the domestic impact of Europe, İçinde, K. Featherstone & C. M. Radaelli (Eds.), The Politics of Europeanization (ss 57-80).Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Börzel, T. (1999). Towards Convergence in Europe? Institutional Adaption to Europeanization in Germany and Spain.Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(4), 573- 596.

Bretherton, C. & Vogler, J. (2006). The European Union as a Global Actor. Oxon: Routledge.

Bruneau, C. (2015). France, Canada Still Seek Diplomatic Solution To Russian-Ukrainian Crisis. http://aviationweek.com/blog/france-canada-still-seek-diplomatic-solution-russian-ukrainian-crisis adresinden 21/01/2016 tarihinde alındı.

Bull, H. (1982). Civilian power Europe: a contradiction in terms?. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 21(2), 149-170.

Bulmer, S. & Radaelli, C. (2005). The Europeanization of National Policy. İçinde, S. Bulmer & C. Lequesne (Eds.), The Member States of the European Union (ss. 357-383). Oxford: Oxford Press.

Bulmer, S. & Burch, M. (1998). Organizing for Europe: Whitehall, the British State and the European Union. Public Administration, 76, 601-628.

Büyükakıncı, E. (2003). Avrupa Birliği-Rusya Federasyonu İlişkilerinde Güvenlik Sorunsalı. İçinde, B. Dedeoğlu (Ed.). Dünden Bugüne Avrupa Birliği (ss. 329-362). İstanbul: Boyut Kitapları.

..........

Wessels, W., Lippert, B. & Umbach, G. (2011). Europeanization of the CEE Executives: EU membership Negotiation as a Shaping Power. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(6), 988- 1012.

White, B. (1999). The European Challenge to Foreign Policy Analysis. European Journal of International Relations, 5(1), 37-66.

White, B. (2001). Understanding European Foreign Policy. Houndmills, NY: Palgrave.

Wong, R. (2008). Towards a common European policy on China? Economic, diplomatic and human rights trends since 1985. Current Politics and Economics of Asia, 17(1), 155-181.

Wong, R. (2011). The Europeanization of Foreign Policy. İçinde, C. Hill ve M. Smith (Eds.), International Relations and the European Union (ss.149-170). Oxford: Oxford Press.

Wong, R. & Hill, C. (Eds.) (2011).National and European foreign policies: toward Europeanisation. London: Routledge.

Wong, R. (2007). Foreign Policy. İçinde, P. Graziano & M. P. Vink (Eds.), Europeanization: New Research Agendas (ss. 321-334). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Wong, R. (2006). The Europeanization of French foreign policy: France and the EU in East Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Zhussipbek, G. (2011). Avrupa Birliği İle Rusya Federasyonu Arasındaki “Stratejik Ortaklığın” Analizi. Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, 7(25), 47-85.

Zielonka, J. (1998). Explaining Euro-Paralysis. Why the European Union is Unable to Act in International Politics. London: Macmillan.

Creative Commons License
This article licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (4.0)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.