Abstract
Abstract. The aim of the risk decision theory is to describe the behavior of agents in the face of several random prospects. Since it is difficult to describe these preferences, we seek to represent them. The use of a representative function of preferences has been for a long time, the usual method of describing behavior in a random context. The obvious advantage of this method is that it allows including these data in a formalized model and, by extension, to understand the optimization process underlying any decision. The determination of the representative function of preferences must be based on an axiomatic basis. From these axioms, an accurate specification of the value function will be derived. The purpose of this article is to examine the history of theories that have sought to determine a satisfactory criterion for responding to the risk decision problem and to analyze the contribution of these models.
Keywords. Risk aversion, Expected Utility (EU), Rank Dependent Expected Utility (RDEU), Gamble.
JEL. D81, C91.
References
Abdellaoui, M., Barrios, C., & Wakker, P. (2007). Reconciling introspective utility with revealed preference: Experimental arguments based on prospect theory, Journal of Econometrics, 138(1), 356-378. doi. 10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.05.025
Abdellaoui, M., & Munier, B. (1994). Expected utility, non expected utility or contingency on risk-structure? An experimental investigation, Document de travail, GRID, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Cachan.
Allais, M. (1953). Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque, critique des postulats et axiomes de l’école américaine, Econometrica, 21(4), 503-546. doi. 10.2307/1907921
Arrow, K. (1965). The theory of risk aversion, in Aspects of the theory of risk bearing, Yrjo J. Saatio, Helsinki.
Battalio, R.C., Kagel, J.H., & Jiranyakul, R.K. (1990). Testing between alternative models of choice under uncertainty: Some initial results, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 3(1), 25-50. doi. 10.1007/BF00213259
Bernouilli, D. (1738). Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis, Comentarii Academiae Scientarum Imperialis Petropolitanae, (1730-1731, publié 1738). pp.175-192. (translated by Pringsheim A., Versuch einer neuen theorie der wertbestimmung von glucksfallen, Leipzig (1896)), (translated by Sommer L., (1954) Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk, Econometrica, 22(), 23-36. doi. 10.1142/9789814293501_0002
Bernouilli, N. (1713). Ars conjectandi, (translated by Hausner R., Warscheinlichkeitsrechnung, Ostwald’s Klassiker der exacten Wissenschaften, 107 und 108, W. Englemann, Leipzig (1899).
Bouyssou, D. (1984). Decision-aid and expected utility theory: A critical survey, in Hagen O. and Wenstop F., (eds), Progress in Utility and Risk Theory, (pp.181-216), Reidel D.
Camerer, C.F. (1992). Recent tests of generalized utility theories, in W. Edwards (ed.), Utility: measurement, Theories and Applications, (pp.207-251), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Chateauneuf, A., Cohen, M., & Meilijson, I. (2005). More pessimism than greediness: A characterization of monotone risk aversion in the Rank Dependent Expected Utility model, Economic Theory, 25(3), 649-667. doi. 10.1007/s00199-003-0451-7
Chateauneuf, A., & Cohen, M. (1994). Risk-seeking with diminishing marginal utility in a non expected utility model, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 9(1), 77-91. doi. 10.1007/BF01073404
Chateauneuf, A., Cohen, M., & Meilijson, I. (1997). New tools to better model behavior under risk and uncertainty: An overview, Finance, 18, 25-46.
Cohen, M. (1995). Comparison of risks and behavior in expected and non-expected utility models, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory.
Cohen, M., & Tallon, J.M. (2000). Décision dans le risque et l’incertain : l’apport des modèles non additifs, Revue d’économie politique, 110(5), 631-681.
Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms, Quarterly Jounal of Economics, 75(4), 643-669. doi. 10.2307/1884324
Etchart, N., & l’Haridon, O. (2011). Monetary incentives in the loss domain and behaviour toward risk: An experimental comparison of three reward schemes including real losses, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 42(1), 61-83. doi. 10.1007/s11166-010-9110-0
Friedman, M., & Savage, L.J. (1948). The utility analysis of choices involving risk, Journal of Political Economy, 56(4), 279-304. doi. 10.1086/256692
Friend, I., & Blume, M. (1975). The demand for risky assets, The American Economic Review.
Gayant, J.P. (2004). Rôle de la transformation des probabilités dans la combinaison d’actifs risqués, Annales d’Economie et de Statistique, 73(1), 141-156.
Gayant, J.P. (1995). Généralisation de L’espérance D’utilité en Univers risqué, représentation et estimation, Revue Economique, 46(4), 1047-1061. doi. 10.3406/reco.1995.409721
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291. doi. 10.1017/CBO9780511609220.014
Kaysen, C. (1946). A revolution in economic theory, Review of Economic Studies, 14(1), 1-15. doi. 10.2307/2295753
Kimball, M. (1990). Precautionary saving in the small and in the large, Econometrica, 58(1), 53-73. doi. 10.2307/2938334
Leland, H. (1972). Theory of the firm facing uncertain demand, American Economic Review, 62(3), 278-291.
Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982). Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty, Economic Journal, 92(368), 805-824. doi. 10.2307/2232669
Machina, M. (1982). Expected utility analysis without the independence axiom, Econometrica, 50(2), 277-323. doi. 10.2307/1912631
Marschak, J. (1950). Rational behavior, uncertain prospects and measurable utility, Econometrica, 18(2), 111-141. doi. 10.2307/1907264
Munier, B. (1989). Calcul économique et révision de la théorie de la décision en avenir risqué, Revue d’économie politique, 99, 276-306.
Pratt, J. (1964). Risk aversion in the small and in the large, Econometrica, 32, 122-136.
Quiggin, J. (1992). Increasing risk: another definition, in Progress in Decision, Utility and Risk Theory, Kluwer A.P.
Quiggin, J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 3(4), 323-343. doi. 10.1016/0167-2681(82)90008-7
Rothschild, M., & Stiglitz, J.E. (1970). Increasing risk: I. A definition, Journal of Economic Theory, 2(3), 225-243. doi. 10.1016/0022-0531(70)90038-4
Sandmo, A. (1971). On the theory of the competitive firm under price uncertainty, American Economic Review, 61(1), 65-73.
Schoemaker, P.J.H. (1991). Choices involving uncertain probabilities: Tests of generalized utility models, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 16(3), 295-317. doi. 10.1016/0167-2681(91)90016-Q
Starmer, C. (1992). Testing new theories of choice under uncertainty using the common consequence effect, Review of Economic Studies, 59(4), 813-830. doi. 10.2307/2297999
Tallon, J.M. (1997). Risque microéconomique et prix d’actifs dans un modèle d’équilibre général avec espérance d’utilité dépendante du rang, Finance, 18(2), 139-153.
Trabelsi, M.A. (2006). Les nouveaux modèles de décision dans le risque et l’incertain : Quel apport ?, Revue Tunisienne d’Economie et de Gestion, 23(2), 161-204.
Tversky, A., & Kahnemann, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297-323. doi. 10.1007/BF00122574
Viala P., & Briys E. (1995). Eléments de théorie financière, editions Nathan.
Vickrey, W. (1945). Measuring marginal utility by reactions to risk, Econometrica, 13(4), 319-333. doi. 10.2307/1906925
Von Neumann J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Yaari, M.E. (1987). The dual theory of choice under risk, Econometrica, 55(1), 95-115. doi. 10.2307/1911158
