Abstract
Abstract. Natural resource redistribution and ownership transfer programs are introduced as a way of improving income distribution and alleviating poverty in rural areas of most developing countries. In the case of South Africa, these redistributive policies are implemented in line with the national development plan targeting extreme poverty alleviation and reduction of wide income disparities by 2030. This paper analyses the distributive effects of the land redistribution policy which is a shock in the agriculture sector on poor household income in South Africa by applying a multiplier decomposition and structural path analysis. The study contributes to the existing literature by providing a microscopic analysis of the global multiplier to show the transmission mechanism of household income from a shock into the agriculture sector and show how income moves across sectors, factors and households by dividing the multiplier effects into all its components. The results showed that poor households received higher direct effects and the rich households received high indirect effects from the shock in the agricultural sector. The structural path shows that a significant portion of the global influence of the shock in agriculture is transmitted through the path of factor income which in turn increases poor household income.
Keywords. Multiplier decomposition, Structural path analysis, Land redistribution.
JEL. I38, O13, Q15, Q18.References
Bautista, R.M., Thomas M., Muir-Leresche, M., & Lofgren, H. (2002). Macroeconomic policy reforms agriculture: Towards equitable growth in Zimbabwe. Research Report, No.128, International Food Policy Research Institute. Washington DC, USA. [Retrieved from].
Chitiga, M.M., & Kandiero, T. (2007). A CGE micro simulation analysis of the impact of trade policies on poverty in Zimbabwe. University of Pretoria Working Paper, No.2007-15.
Civardi, M.B. & Lenti, R.T. (2007). Multiplier decomposition, inequality and poverty in a SAM framework, Societa Italiana di Economia Pubblica, Working Paper, No.482. [Retrieved from].
Defourny, J., & Thorbecke, E., (1984). Structural path analysis and multiplier decomposition within a SAM framework. The Economic Journal, 94(373), 111-136. doi. 10.2307/2232220
Delgado, C., Hazell, P., Hopkins, J., & Kely, V. (1994). Promoting intersectoral growth linkages in rural Africa through agricultural technology and policy reform, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76(5),1166-1171. doi. 10.2307/1243411
DFID, (2003). Department for International Development report, South Africa.
Juana, J.S., & Mabugu, R. (2005). Assessment of the smallholder agriculture’s contribution to the economy of Zimbabwe: A social accounting matrix multiplier analysis. Agrekon, 44(3), 344-362. doi. 10.1080/03031853.2005.9523716
Juana, J.S., Kirsten J.F., & Strzepek K.M.(2006). Inter-sectorial water use in South Africa. 26th International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference, Gold Coast, Australia, August 12-18.
Lahiff, E., & Cousins, B. (2005). Smallholder agriculture and land reform in South Africa, IDS Bulletin, 36(2). 127-131. doi. 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2005.tb00209.x
Lantner, A. (1974). Theorie de la Dominance Economique, Paris. Dunod.
Nseera, E. (2014). Growth and distributional impact of agriculture, textiles and mining sector in Lesotho. African Development Bank, Working Paper, No.206. [Retrieved from].
Ncube, M., & Brixiova, Z. (2012). Remitances and macroeconomics impact evidence: African Development Bank Group, Working Paper Series No. 188. [Retrieved from].
Olbrich, A. & Hassan, B. (1999). A comparison of the economic efficiency of water use of plantations, irrigated sugarcane and sub-tropical fruits: A case study of Crocodile River Catchment, Mpumalanga Province, WRC report No 666/1/99. The water Research Commission, Pretoria.
Pansini, R.V., (2008). Multiplier decomposition, poverty and inequality in income distribution in a SAM framework: The Vietnamese case. MPRA Working Paper, No.13182. [Retrieved from].
Pyatt, G. & J.I. Round (1979), Accounting and fixed prices multipliers in a social accounting framework, The Economic Journal, 89(356), 850-73. doi. 10.2307/2231503
Pyatt, G., & Round, J. (2004). Multiplier Effects and the Reduction of Poverty, Coventry: University of Warwick.
Pyatt, G., & Round, J. (2006). Multiplier effects and the reduction of poverty. In A. De Janvry & R. Kanbur (Eds). Poverty, Inequality and Development: Essays in Honour of Erik Thorbecke. New York: Springer.
Round, J. (2003a). Social accounting matrices and SAM-based multiplier analysis, In F. Bourguignon, L..P da Silva, & N.Stern (Eds.), Evaluating the Poverty Impact of Economic Policies: Some Analytical Challenges. Washington DC: World Bank.
Round, J.I. (2003b), Constructing SAMs for development policy analysis: Lessons learned and challenges ahead’, Economic System Research, 15(2), 161-184. doi. 10.1080/0953531032000091153
Saudolet, E., & De Janvry, A. (1995). Quantitative Development Analysis, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Thorbecke, E. (2000). The use of social accounting matrices in modeling, 26th General Conference of the International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, IARIW, Cracow.
Thurlow, J. (2002). A standard computable general equilibrium model for South Africa: IFPRI TDP Discussion Paper No.100.
World Bank. (2006). World development indicators. Washington, DC World Bank.
