Abstract
Abstract. Institutional research is ready to move to the next stage, the stage, as argued by this paper, should be characterized with a more comprehensive and integrated social sciences approach. The theoretical foundation for such a move exists, as the naturel connections between political institutions and economic institutions were well addressed by North, Fukuyama, and Acemoglu; the influences of cultural heritage on the institutional choices were aldo discussed by North and Huntington. Another shift in institutional research proposed by this paper is the change from the general solutions to the specific solutions because the institutional characteristics are individualized after considering the impacts of culture heritage. Through the data analysis of World Governance Index (WGI) and other development indicators this paper presents the connections between political and economic institutions and the unique characteristics of political orders and developmental paths of a few specific groups of countries. The paper also discusses the influences of cultural heritage on the institution’s choice and transformation path. Finally the paper proposes an institutional research framework.
Keywords. Institutional economics, Political economy, Comparative economic system, Comparative political system, World Governance Index (WGI).
JEL. O43, P26, P51.
References
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J.A. (2012). Why Nations Fail: the Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Crown Publishers, New York.
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J.A. (2002). Reversal of Fortune: geography and institutions in the making of the modern world income distribution. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1231–1294. doi. 10.1162/003355302320935025
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J.A. (2005). Institutions as the fundamental cause of long-run growth, in: P. Aghion, & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth, Vol. 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 385-472.
Acemoglu, D., Naidu, S., Restrepo, P., & Robinson, J.A. (2014). Democracy does cause growth. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 20004. doi. 10.3386/w20004
Bortis, H. (1997). Institutions, Behaviour and Economic Theory. Cambridge University, Press.
Clark, L. (2005).The Polished Mirror: Reflections on Natural Knowledge of the Way in Zhuangzi and Alive Plantinga, Presented at the Tenth Anniversary Symposium in Philosophy and Religion, Peking University, October, pp. 19-21.
Coase, W., & Wang, N. (2012). How China Became Capitalist. Palgrave MacMillan, London.
Durant, W.A. (1993). The Story of The Civilization, MJF Books.
Fukuyama, F. (2012). The Origin of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French revulation. Farrar, Straus & Giroux: Paris.
Henisz, W.J. (2000). The institutional environment for economic growth. Economics & Politics. 12(1), 1-31. doi. 10.1111/1468-0343.00066
Kornai, J. (2005). The great transformation of Central Eastern Europe: success and disappointment, presidential address. Presented at I.E.A. 14th World Congress, Marrakech, Morocco, 29 August, 2005.
North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Rawls, J. (1971). The Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press: Cambridge.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Alfred A. Knopf: New York.
Varsakelis, N.C. (2006). Education, political institutions and innovative activity: a cross-country empirical investigation. Research Policy, 35(7), 1083-1090. doi. 10.1016/j.respol.2006.06.002
