Abstract
Abstract. Inter-organizational relationship is increasingly important for modern business world because of its benefits for efficient integration for resources from various parties, facilitation for new knowledge creation, and synergetic use of the collective decision, action and idiosyncratic capabilities. I tend to offer a conceptual discussion for the connections among inter-organizational relationship, governance for organizational learning, and collaborative research in a franchising system context. Important research imperatives were proposed finally.
Keywords. Interorganizational relationship, Franchising system, Governance for learning, Collaborative research.
JEL. M10, M11, M14.
References
Adler, P.S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept, Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
Amabile, T.M., Patterson, C., Mueller, J.S., Wojcik, T., Odomirok, P., Marsh, M., & Kramer, S. (2001). Academic-practitioner collaboration in management research: A case of cross-profession collaboration, Academy of Management Journal, 44, 418-431.
Bollingtoft, A., & Ulhoi, J.P. (2005). The networked business incubator-leveraging entreprenuerial agency?, Jounral of Business Venturing, 20(2), 265-290. doi. 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.005
Buisseret, T.J., & Cameron, H. (1994). Management of collaborative research: Collaboration and exploitation under the UK's information engineering advanced technology programme, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 6(2), 215. doi. 10.1080/09537329408524165
Dixon, N.D. (2000). Common Knowledge: How Companies Thrive by Sharing What They Know Harvard Business School, Boston.
Dodgson, M., Mathew, J., & Kastelle, T. (2006). The evolving role of research consortia in East Asia. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 8(1), 84-101. doi. 10.5172/impp.2006.8.1-2.84
Dyer, J.H., & Nobeoka, K. (2000). Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network The Toyota case, Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 345-367. doi. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<345::AID-SMJ96>3.0.CO;2-N
Dyer, J.H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage, Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679. doi. 10.5465/AMR.1998.1255632
Garrett-Jones, S., Turpin, T., Burns, P., & Diment, K. (2005). Common purpose and divided loyalties: the risks and rewards of cross-sector collaboration for academic and government researchers, R&D Management, 35(5), 535-544. doi. 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00410.x
Gulati, R. (1995). Dose familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliance, Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 85-112. doi. 10.2307/256729
Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks, Strategic Management Journal, 19, 293-317. doi. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199804)19:4<293::AID-SMJ982>3.0.CO;2-M
Gulati, R., & Singh, H. (1998). The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances, Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 781-814. doi. 10.2307/2393616
Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E.W.K. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 146-165. doi. 10.5465/AMR.2005.15281445
Kale, P., Singh, H., & Perlmutter, H. (2000). Learning and protection assets in strategic alliance: Building relational capital, Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 217-237. doi. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<217::AID-SMJ95>3.0.CO;2-Y
Lam, A. (2003). Organizational learning in multinationals: R&D networks of Japanese and US MNEs in the UK, Journal of Management Studies, 40(3), 673-703. doi. 10.1111/1467-6486.00356
Larson, A. (1992). Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships, Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 76-104. doi. 10.2307/2393534
Lavie, D. (2006). The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view, Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 638-658. doi. 10.5465/AMR.2006.21318922
Lundvall, B. (2006). Interactive learning, social capital and economic performance, in D. Foray, & B. Kahin (Eds.), Advancing Knowledge and the Knowledge Economy, Harvard University Press, Boston.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage, Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266. doi. 10.5465/AMR.1998.533225
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, Ba, and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation, Long Range Planning, 33, 5-34. doi. 10.1016/S0024-6301(99)00115-6
Rynes, S. L., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2001). Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics, Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 340-355. doi. 10.2307/3069460
Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 27-43. doi. 10.1002/smj.4250171105
Totterman, H., & Sten, J. (2005). Start-ups: Business incubation and social capital, International Small Business Journal, 23(5), 487-511. doi. 10.1177/0266242605055909
Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks, Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464-476. doi. 10.2307/257085
von Krogh, G., Ichijo, K., & Nonaka, I. (2000). Enabling Knowledge Creation: How to Unlock the Mystery of Tacit Knowledge and Release of Innovation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapinza, H.J. (2001). Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young techonology-based firms, Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 587-613. doi. 10.1002/smj.183
Zaheer, A., & Venkatraman, N. (1995). Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange, Strategic Management Journal, 16(5), 373-392. doi. 10.1002/smj.4250160504
