Does globalization affect female labor force participation: Panel evidence
PDF

Keywords

Globalization
Female labor force participation
Panel Data.

How to Cite

OKŞAK, Y., & YALÇINKAYA KOYUNCU, J. (2017). Does globalization affect female labor force participation: Panel evidence. Journal of Economics Bibliography, 4(4), 381–387. https://doi.org/10.1453/jeb.v4i4.1541

Abstract

Various theoretical and empirical dimensions of the subject of globalization have been intensively examined in the literature of social science, particularly since 1990s. Besides those existing studies in the literature, we empirically investigate the effect of globalization on the woman’s participation to labor force for four distinct globalization indicators (i.e., economic globalization, social globalization, politic globalization, and overall globalization index). An unbalanced data containing the years of 1990-2014 for 101 countries in the largest sense has been utilized in the analyses. Estimation results imply that there is a positive statistically significant relationship between economic globalization, social globalization, overall globalization and female labor force participation. On the other hand we found a negative statistically significant association between politic globalization and female labor force participation. Meantime it was seen that all of the covariates used in the analyses took the expected signs and were statistically significant in almost all models.

Key Words: Globalization, Female Labor Force Participation, Panel Data.

JEL Class.: F66, J82.   

https://doi.org/10.1453/jeb.v4i4.1541
PDF

References

Abdulloev, I., Gang, N.I., Yun, M.S. (2014). Migration, education and the gender gap in labour force participation, European Journal of Development Research, 26(4), 509-526. doi. 10.1057/ejdr.2014.27

Akbulut, R. (2011). Sectoral changes and the increase in women’s labor force participation, Macroeconomic Dynamics, 15(2), 240-264. doi. 10.1017/S1365100510000040

Bercovici, J. (2007). The workplace romance and sexual favoritism: Creating a dialogue between social science and the law of sexual harassment. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 16, 183-214.

Bussmann, M. (2009). The effect of trade openness on women’s welfare and work life. World Development, 37(6), 1027-1038. doi. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.10.007

Cooray, A., Gaddis, I., & Wacker, K.M. (2012). Globalization and female labor force participation in developing countries: An empirical (re-)assessment, Courant Research Centre: Poverty. Equity and Growth-Discussion Papers. No. 129. [Retrieved from].

Croda, E., Kyriazidou, E., & Polycarpou, I. (2011). Intertemporal labor force participation of married women in Germany: A panel data analysis, Venetiarvm Universitas Department of Economics Working Paper, No.17, WP/2011. [Retrieved from].

Fazio, M.M., Hughes J., & Zhang, D. (2007). An ocean formed from one Hundred Rivers: The effects of ethnicity, gender, marriage, and location on labor force participation in urban China. Feminist Economics, 13(3-4), 159-187. doi. 10.1080/13545700701439424

Foley, M., Maxwell, G., & McGillivray, D. (1999). Women at leisure and work - Unequal opportunities. Equal Opportunities, 18(1), 8-18. doi. 10.1108/02610159910785637

Gaddis, I., & Klasen S. (2014). Economic development, structural change, and women’s labor force participation: A reexamination of the feminization U hypothesis. Journal of Populayion Economics, 27(3), 639-681. doi. 10.1007/s00148-013-0488-2

H'madoun, M. (2010). Religion and labor force participation of women. UA, Faculty of Applied Economics. [Retrieved from].

Korotayev, V.A., Issaev, M.L., & Shishkina, R.A. (2015). Female labor force participation rate, Islam, and Arab culture in cross-cultural perspective. Cross-Cultural Research, 49(1), 3–19. doi. 10.1177/1069397114536126

Koyuncu, C., & Özen E. (2017a). Empirical Analysis of Impact of Poverty on Female Labor Force Participation. IBANESS Conference Series–Ohrid/ Republic of Macedonia, (pp.189-196), October 28-29.

Koyuncu, C., & Özen E. (2017b). Do Institutional Factors Affect Female Labor Force Participation: Panel Analysis. IBANESS Conference Series–Ohrid/ Republic of Macedonia, (pp.197-206), October 28-29.

Koyuncu, C., & Özen E. (2017c). Religious, ethnic, linguistic and cultural diversity and female labor force participation. Journal of Economics Bibliography, 4(1), 87-93.

Koyuncu, C., & Sarıtaş T. (2017). Analysis of globalization and economic growth for Turkey with ARDL model. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 17(2), 51-66.

Koyuncu, J.Y., & Koyuncu, C. (2016). Corruption and globalization. International Osmaneli Social Sciences Congress–Bilecik/Turkey, (pp.804-813), 12-13-14 October.

Kucera, D. (2001). Foreign Trade of manufactures and men and women’s employment and earnings in Germany and Japan, International Review of Applied Economics, 15(2), 130-148. doi. 10.1080/02692170151136998

Maqsood, F. (2014). Impact of globalization on female labor force participation in the SAARC region. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 34(2), 523-533.

Moghadam, V.M. (1999). Gender and globalization: Female labor and women’s mobilization, Journal of World-Systems Research, 5(2), 367-388. doi. 10.5195/jwsr.1999.139

Ray, L. (2002). Crossing borders? Sociology, globalization and immobility. Sociological Research Online, 7(3), 1-14. doi. 10.5153/sro.739

Olmsted, J.C. (2011). Gender and Globalization. Veiled Employment: Islamism and the Political Economy of Women’s Employment. Syracusa University Press, New York.

Siddiqui, R. (2009). Modeling gender effects of Pakistan’s trade liberalization. Feminist Economics, 15(3), 287-321. doi. 10.1080/13545700902964295

Creative Commons License
This article licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (4.0)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.