Abstract
Abstract. Despite the great theoretical and practical significance, in Bulgaria there are no comprehensive analysis of the state and evolution of the system of agricultural information, training and advices in Bulgaria. The goal of this paper is to analyze the state and evolution of the system of agricultural information, training and advices in Bulgaria during the period after country’s EU accession, identify major trends in that area, make a comparison with other EU states, specify main problems, and suggest conclusions for improvement of policies during next programing period. The analysis has found out that in years after accession of the country to EU the number of the farm managers who undertook full agricultural training increases, but despite that almost 93% of them are still with practical experiences and without any agricultural training. The extent of participation of rural areas rests weak and constantly decreasing, and Bulgaria is among the last in EU in hours of formal and informal education and training. In years of EU membership the number of provided consultations is doubled and in recent years 17% of all registered agricultural producers and each tenth farmer in the country are consulted while the subjects of provided consultation widened. Also hundreds of events associated with knowledge and innovation transfer and sharing are organized as most of them are jointly organized by the National Advisory Service with the institutes of Agricultural Academy, agrarian and other universities, research and development organizations. The number of organized events, the overall number of participants, and the average number of participant per event tend to decrease.
Keywords. Training, Consultation, Advices, Agriculture, Bulgaria.
JEL. Q10, O31, O33, Q01, Q16, Q18.
References
Башев Х. (2020). Дигитализация на селското стопанство и райони в България, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, бр.1.
Башев Х. (2018). Влияние на институционалната среда върху аграрната устойчивост в България, Икономическа мисъл, 3-32.
Башев Х. (2014). Екоуправление в селското стопанство, Икономическа мисъл, 1, 29-55.
Башев Х. (2009). Управление на договорните отношения на фермата, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, 2, 38-50.
Башев Х. (2008). Еко-управление в българското земеделие-форми, ефективност, перспективи, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, 1, 33-43.
Башев Х. (2005). Подход за оценка на устойчивостта на фермите, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, 6, 24-37.
Башев Х. и М.Михайлова (2019). Състояние и развитие на аграрната научноизследователска и развойна дейност в България, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, бр.3, 3-22.
Башев Х. и М.Михайлова (2019). Състояние и развитие на системата за обучение и съвети в селското стопанство на България, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, бр.3, 21-41.
Башев Х. и М.Михайлова (2019). Състояние, ефективност и фактори за развитие на системата за споделяне на знания, иновации и дигитализация в селското стопанство, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, бр.4, 3-23,
Башев Х., Н. Котева, М. Младенова (2014). Ефекти от прилагане на европейски политики върху земеделските стопанства в Р.България, сп. Икономика, 4-1, 97-114.
Башев Х., Ш. Че (2019). Управление и оценка на аграрната устойчивост в България и Китай, Институт по аграрна икономика.
Иванов Б., Р. Попов, Х. Башев, Н. Котева, Н. Маламова, М. Чопева, К. Тодорова, И. Начева, Д. Митова (2020). ДОКЛАД АНАЛИЗ НА СЪСТОЯНИЕТО НА СЕЛСКОТО СТОПАНСТВО И ХРАНИТЕЛНОВКУСОВАТА ПРОМИШЛЕНОСТ SWOT АНАЛИЗ, ИАИ. [Retrieved from].
Селскостопанска академия (2019). Годишни отчети и друга официална информация.
Министерство на земеделието, храните и горите (2019). Аграрни доклади.
Национална служба за съвети в земеделието (2019). Годишни отчети за дейността на НССЗ и друга официална информация.
Национален статистически институт (2019). разнообразни данни.
Последваща оценка на ПРСР 2007-2013 г., ЗАКЛЮЧИТЕЛЕН ДОКЛАД, МЗХ, 2018г.
Anandajayasekeram P. and B. Gebremedhin (2009): Integrating innovation systems perspective and value chain analysis in agricultural research for development: Implications and challenges. Improving Productivity and Market Success (IPMS) of Ethiopian Farmers Project Working Paper 16, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi.
Antle, J., Jones, J., & Rosenzweigc, C. (2017). Next generation agricultural system data, models and knowledge products, Introduction, Agricultural Systems, 155, 186-190. doi. 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.09.003
Bachev, H. (2015). What is Sustainability of Farms?, Journal of Economic and Social Thought, 3(1), 35-48
Bachev, H. (2013). Risk management in the agri-food sector, Contemporary Economics, 7(1), 45-62.
Bachev, H. (2018). Management and agrarian sustainability-impact of institutions in Bulgaria, International Journal of Management and Sustainability, 7(2), 113-142. doi. 10.18488/journal.11.2018.72.113.142
Bachev, H. (2020). State and evolution of public and private research and development in Bulgarian agriculture, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Policy, 9(1), 10-25.
Bachev, H., & Labonne, M. (2000). About the organization of agrarian innovations, Station d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurale, Ecole Nationale Superieure Agronomique (ENSA, INRA).
Bachev, H., Ivanov, B., Sokolova, E., & Toteva, D. (2017). Agricultural sustainability in Bulgaria - Levels and factors, International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, 6(2), 42-51.
Bachev, H., Ivanov, B., Sokolova, E., & Toteva, D. (2017). Evaluation of agrarian sustainability in Bulgaria, Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, 4(3), 233-242.
Bachev, H., & Mihailova, M. (2019). Analysis of the State of the System of Sharing of Knowledge and Innovations in Bulgarian Agriculture, EconPapers. [Retrieved from].
Bachev, H., & Labonne, M. (2000). About the organization of agrarian innovations, Station d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurale, Ecole Nationale Superieure Agronomique (ENSA, INRA).
Bachev, H., & Tanic, S. (2011). Issues and challenges for farm and enterprise diversification and integration of small scale farmers into value chains in EECA, FAO Consultation on “Enabling Environment for producer-agribusiness linkages in EECA”, Ankara.
DG AGRI, (2019). Various data.
EIP-AGRI EU SCAR, (2012). Agricultural knowledge and innovation systems in transition – a reflection paper, Brussels.
ENRD, (2019). The European Network for Rural Development, разнообразни данни. [Retrieved from].
Eurostat, (2019). разнообразни данни. [Retrieved from].
European Commission, (2018). Proposal for a Regulation of the European parliament and of the council, Establishing rules on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the Common agricultural policy (CAP Strategic Plans) and financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, European Commission, Brussels, 1.6.2018
FAO, (2019). Communication in research and development, FAO. [Retrieved from].
Chartier, O., Doghmi, M., Fourcin, C., Broek, M., & Midmore, P. (2015). Investment in Agricultural Research in Europe: Synthesis Report, IMPRESA project, EC 7th Framework Programme.
Todorova, S., & Bachev, H. (2018). Farming structures in transition agriculture: The case of Bulgaria, Tohoku Journal of Rural Economics, 26(2), 32-47.
Touzard J., Temple, L., Faure, G., & Triomphe, B. (2015). Innovation systems and knowledge communities in the agriculture and agrifood sector: A literature review, Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 2(17), 117-142. doi. 10.3917/jie.017.0117
Özçatalbaş, O. (2017). Human development and research-development-extension relationships, in S. Maad (editor) Research and Development Evolving Trends and Practices - Towards Human, Institutional and Economic Sectors Growth, IntechOpen, doi. 10.5772/intechopen.69096
USDA, (2019). Agricultural research funding in the public and private sectors, USDA. [Retrieved from].
Weißhuhn, P., Helming, K., & Ferretti, J. (2018). Research impact assessment in agriculture-A review of approaches and impact areas, Research Evaluation, 27(1), 36–42. doi. 10.1093/reseval/rvx034
World Bank, (2006). Enhancing agricultural innovation: How to go beyond the strengthening of research systems, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank, Washington DC.
Virmani, S. (2013). Public-private partnership and policy reforms for effective agricultural research, development, and training, in G. Bhullar & N. Bhullar, Agricultural Sustainability, Elsevier.