On the Economic Returns From a Global Program of Social Capital: A Trillion Dollar Agenda for Growth
PDF

How to Cite

KIM, S. H. (2016). On the Economic Returns From a Global Program of Social Capital: A Trillion Dollar Agenda for Growth. Journal of Economics and Political Economy, 3(4), 720–730. https://doi.org/10.1453/jepe.v3i4.1105

Abstract

Abstract

For the economy to grow, the actors in the marketplace need to expand the overall output rather than jostle each other for bigger shares of the available output. To this end, the productivity level may be boosted through a comprehensive program of social capital. Based on the experience of the 20th century, the rich countries of the world could afford to commit US$1 trillion per year for a couple of decades. According to a compelling scenario, the total investment of $20 trillion in nominal terms will comprise $13.6 trillion in current dollars since the funds will be disbursed over time rather than spent at once. Based on conservative estimates, the present value of the benefits will exceed $3.39 quadrillion which represents a payback of 249 times the original investment. In this way, the windfall from a global program of social capital should far surpass the outlay required for its implementation.

Key words: Economic Growth, Social Capital, Foreign Aid, Emerging Markets, Productivity

JEL: E20, E60, O10, P00, Z10.
https://doi.org/10.1453/jepe.v3i4.1105
PDF

References

Blackwill, R.D., & Harris, J.M. (2016). The Lost Art of Economic Statecraft. March/April. [Retrieved from].

Census Bureau, United States. (2000). Historical National Population Estimates. June 28. [Retrieved from].

Central Intelligence Agency. (2016a). Country Comparison: GDP Per Capita (PPP). The World Factbook. [Retrieved from].

Central Intelligence Agency. (2016b). The World Factbook. [Retrieved from].

Centre for Economic Policy Research. (2015). Euro Area Out of Recession, in Unusually Weak Expansion. Oct. [Retrieved from].

Clemens, M.A. (2011). Economics and Emigration: Trillion-Dollar Bills on the Sidewalk? Aug. 19. [Retrieved from].

Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere. (2015). For 70 Years, Delivering Lasting Change. Aug. 31. [Retrieved from].

De Long, J.B., & Eichengreen, B. (1991). The Marshall Plan. NBER Working Paper, No. 3899. doi. 10.3386/w3899

Department of Commerce, U.S. (1949). Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1949. Sep., pp. 846-848. [Retrieved from].

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. (2016). Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Feb. 15. [Retrieved from].

Henderson, D.R. (2008). German Economic Miracle. 2008. [Retrieved from].

Kim, S.H. (1990). Designing Intelligence. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, Ch. 6. [Retrieved from]. or [Retrieved from].

Kim, S.H. (2012). Charade of the Debt Crisis. MintKit Press. [Retrieved from].

Kim, S.H. (2016). Complex Factors Behind Misguided Policies in Socioeconomics: From Mass Migration and Persistent Alienation to Rampant Crime and Economic Malaise. Journal of Economics and Social Thought, 3(3), 376-399.

Labor Statistics, U.S. Bureau of. (2016). CPI Inflation Calculator. [Retrieved from].

Ritschl, A. (2012). Germany, Greece and the Marshall Plan. June 15. [Retrieved from].

Transparency International. (2013). Global Corruption Barometer 2013, pp. 3-4; 33-38. [Retrieved from].

United Nations. (2015). World Population Projected to Reach 9.7 Billion by 2050. July 29. [Retrieved from].

Wen, Y. (2014). Evaluating Unconventional Monetary Policies ─ Why Aren’t They More Effective? Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Workpaper 2013-028B, Oct., rev. Jan. 2014. [Retrieved from].

Creative Commons License
This article licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (4.0)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.