Analysis of Asymmetries in the Tax-Spending Nexus in Burundi
PDF

Supplementary Files

Dataset
Conflict Relation Interest Form
Compliance with ethical and research principles Form

Keywords

Spending
Taxes
Grants
Threshold Cointegration
Asymmetric ECM
Burundi

How to Cite

NDORICIMPA, A. (2017). Analysis of Asymmetries in the Tax-Spending Nexus in Burundi. Journal of Economics and Political Economy, 4(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1453/jepe.v4i1.1160

Abstract

Abstract. This study examines the asymmetries in the tax-spending nexus for Burundi using a three-variable model. The study employs a threshold cointegration test with asymmetric adjustment advanced by Enders & Siklos (2001). The findings indicate that government spending, taxes and grants are cointegrated with asymmetric adjustment. Causality tests from the estimated asymmetric error correction model suggest that in the short run there is an independent relationship between government spending and taxes in Burundi. Pertaining to the impact of grants, the results show that grants encourage the government of Burundi to spend more, but, conversely, they also discourage tax revenue, which is known as the tax displacement hypothesis. The findings further show that only government spending responds to budgetary disequilibrium, and this occurs when the budget situation is worsening. This implies that in Burundi, to restore the equilibrium when the budget situation is worsening, the adjustment is made by reducing spending. A policy intuition arising from this study is that, to reduce budget deficits, Burundi should reduce its grant-dependence and improve its tax collection system as well as cut its spending in sectors where it is not productive and reallocate it to more productive sectors.

Keywords. Burundi, Spending, Taxes, Grants, Threshold cointegration, Asymmetric ECM.

JEL. C32, E32, H20, H50, H62.

https://doi.org/10.1453/jepe.v4i1.1160
PDF

References

Alesina, A. & Dollar, D. (2000). Who gives foreign aid to whom and why? Journal of Economic Growth, 5(1), 33-63. doi. 10.1023/A:1009874203400

Apergis, N., Payne, J.E. & Saunoris, J.W. (2012). Tax-spend nexus in Greece: Are there asymmetries? Journal of Economic Studies, 39(3), 327-336. doi. 10.1108/01443581211245900

Aregbeyen, O. & Taofik, M.I. (2012). Testing the revenue and expenditure nexus in Nigeria: An application of the bound test approach. European Journal of Social Sciences, 27(3), 374-380.

Baghestani, H. & McNown, R. (1994). Do revenue or expenditure respond to budgetary disequilibria? Southern Economic Journal, 61(2), 311-322. doi. 10.2307/1059979

Balke, N.S., & Fomby, T.B. (1997). Threshold cointegration. International Economic Review, 38(3), 627-645. doi. 10.2307/2527284

Barro, R.J. (1986). Are government bonds net wealth? Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1095-1117. doi. 10.1086/260266

Bartlett, B. (2007). Starve the beast: Origins and development of a budgetary metaphor. The Independent Review, 12(1), 1086-1653.

Benedek, D., Crivelli, E., Gupta, S. & Muthoora, P. (2012). Foreign aid and revenue: Still a crowding out effect?, IMF Working Paper, No.WP/12/186. [Retrieved from].

Bohn, H. (1991). Budget balance through revenue or spending adjustment? Some historical evidence for the United States. Journal of Monetary Economics, 27(3), 333-359. doi. 10.1016/0304-3932(91)90013-E

BRB (Central Bank of Burundi) (2008). Rapport Annuel de la Banque de la République du Burundi. Bujumbura. [Retrieved from].

BRB (Central Bank of Burundi) (2013). Rapport Annuel de la Banque de la République du Burundi. Bujumbura. [Retrieved from].

Buchanan, J.M. & Wagner, R.E. (1977). Democracy in Deficit: The Political Legacy of lord Keynes. New York: Academic Press.

Câmara, D.S. & Ferreira, P. (2001). The European Union's political and development response to Burundi. ECDPM Discussion Paper 29, Maastricht: ECDPM. [Retrieved from].

Campbell, S. (2003). A framework for responsible aid to Burundi. International Crisis Group, Africa Report, N0.57. [Retrieved from]

Carneiro, F.G., Faria, J.R. & Barry, B.S. (2005). Government revenues and expenditures in guinea-bissau: Causality and cointegration. Journal of Economic Development, 30(1), 107-117.

Chang, T. & Yuan-Hong, H. (2002). Tax or spend, what causes what: Taiwan’s experience. International Journal of Business and Economics, 1(2), 157-165.

Darrat, A.F. (2002). Budget balance through spending cuts or tax adjustments? Contemporary Economic Policy, 20(3), 221-233. doi. 10.1093/cep/20.3.221

Debrun, X., M. Saito, I. Ioannou & B. Gruss (2011). Burundi - ex post assessment of the longer-term program engagement. International Monetary Fund, IMF Report No.11/269. [Retrieved from].

De Castro, F., Gonzalez-Paramo, J.M. & De Cos, P.H. (2004). Fiscal consolidation in Spain: Dynamic interdependence of public spending and revenues. Investigaciones Economicas, 28(1), 193-207.

Enders, W. & Granger, C.W.F. (1998). Unit-root tests and asymmetric adjustment with an example using the term structure of interest rates. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 16(3), 304-311.

Enders, W. & Siklos, P.L. (2001). Cointegration and threshold adjustment. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 19(2), 166-176. doi. 10.1198/073500101316970395

Engle, R.F. & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing. Econometrica, 55 (2), 251-276. doi. 10.2307/1913236

Ewing, B.T., Payne, J.E., Thompson, M.A. & Al-Zoubi, M.T. (2006). Government expenditures and revenues: Evidence from asymmetric modeling. Southern Economic Journal, 73, 190-200.

Feyzioglu T., Vinaya S. & Min Z. (1998). A panel data analysis of the fungibility of foreign aid. World Bank Economic Review, 12(1), 29-58.

Friedman, M. (1978). The limitations of tax limitation. Policy Review, 5(78), 7-14. [Retrieved from].

Garcia, M.J. (2012). The revenues-expenditures nexus: A panel data analysis of Spain’s regions. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 1, 24-38

Gramlich, E. (1970). The effects of federal grants on state-local expenditures: A review of the econometric literature. In S.J. Bowers, National Tax Association, Proceedings of the 62nd annual conference. Columbus, Ohio.

Gupta, S., Clements, B., Pivovarsky, A. & Tiongson, E. (2003). Foreign aid and revenue response: Does the composition of aid matter? IMF Working Paper, WP/03/176, International Monetary Fund, Washington DC. [Retrieved from].

Heller, P., & Gupta, S. (2002). More aid: Making it work for the poor. World Economics, 3(4), 131-146.

IMF, (2011). Burundi - Évaluation ex post de la mise en oeuvre sur longue période des programmes. Rapport du FMI No.11/269, Septembre.

Keho, Y. (2010). Budget balance through revenue or spending adjustments? An econometric analysis of the ivorian budgetary process, 1960-2005. Journal of Economics and International Finance, 2, 001-011.

Keho, Y. (2013). Threshold Cointegration and Asymmetric Adjustment between Government Spending and Revenue in Côte d’Ivoire. Asian Journal of Empirical Research, 3(4), 420-432.

Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P.C.B., Schmidt, P. & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit toot? Journal of Econometrics, 54, 159-178. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y

Lanne, M., Saikkonen, P. & Lütkepohl, H. (2003). Test procedures for unit roots in time series with level shifts at unknown time. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65, 91-115. doi. 10.1111/1468-0084.00036

Lu, Yang-Cheng, T. Chang & Yu, C-P. (2011). Long-run purchasing power parity with asymmetric adjustment: Evidence from Mainland China and Taiwan. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 3, 59-70.

Martins, P.M.G. (2007). The impact of foreign aid on government spending, revenue and domestic borrowing in Ethiopia. International Poverty Centre, Working Paper, No.41. [Retrieved from].

Maynard, T. & Guy, K. (2009). The causal relationship between government expenditure and tax revenue in Barbados. Research Department, Central Bank of Barbados. [Retrieved from].

Mehrara, M. & Pahlavani, M. (2011). Government revenue and government expenditure nexus in Asian countries: Panel cointegration and causality. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(7), 199-207.

Meltzer, A.H. & Richard, S.F. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 914-927. doi. 10.1086/261013

Moisio, A. (2001). Spend and tax or tax and spend? Panel data evidence from finnish municipalities during 1985-1999. Government Institute for Economic Research, Discussion Papers, No.242. [Retrieved from].

Morrissey, O. (2012). Aid and government fiscal behaviour: What does the evidence say? UNU-WIDER, Working Paper, No.2012/01, United Nations University, Helsinki. [Retrieved from].

Murat, A. & Murat, T. (2009). Is fiscal synchronization hypothesis relevant for Turkey? Evidence from cointegration and causality tests with endogenous structural breaks. Journal of Money, Investment and Banking, 12, 14-25.

Musgrave, R. (1966). Principles of budget determination. In H. Cameron & W. Henderson (Eds.), Public Finance Selected Reading, (pp.15-27). New York: Random House.

Narayan, P.K. & Narayan, S. (2007). Government revenue and government expenditure nexus: Evidence from developing countries. Applied Economics, 38(3), 285-291. doi. 10.1080/00036840500369209

Nath, S. & Sobhee, S.K. (2007). Aid motivation and donor behavior. American Review of Political Economy, 5(1), 1-13.

Ndikumana, L. (2001). Fiscal policy, conflict, and reconstruction in Burundi and Rwanda. UN-WIDER, Discussion Paper, No.2001/62, United Nations University, Helsinki, [Retrieved from].

Nkurunziza, J.D. (2004). How long can inflation tax compensate for the loss of government revenue in war economies? Evidence from Burundi. CSAE, Working Paper, No.2004-19. [Retrieved from].

Njeru, J. (2003). The impact of foreign aid on public expenditure: The case of Kenya. AERC Research Paper, No.135, African Economic Research Consortium, Nairobi. [Retrieved from].

Peacock, A.T. & Wiseman, T. (1979). Approaches to the analysis of government expenditure growth. Public Finance Review, 7(1), 3-23. doi. 10.1177/109114217900700101

Rafaqet, A. & Mahmood, S. (2012). The causal relationship between government expenditure and revenue in Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3, 323-329.

Rethabile, F.M. & Sephooko, I.M. (2012). Government revenue-expenditure nexus in Lesotho: The decline in SACU revenue. American Journal of Economics, 2(1), 8-14. doi. 10.5923/j.economics.20120201.02

Saunoris, J.W. & Payne, J.E. (2010). Tax more or spend less? Asymmetries in the UK revenue expenditure nexus. Journal of Policy Modeling, 32, 478-487. doi.10.1016/j.jpolmod.2010.05.012

Sobhee, S.K. (2004). The causality between tax and spend of the public sector in Mauritius: A VECM approach. International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies, 1(3), 115-130.

Stigler, M. (2013). Threshold cointegration: Overview and implementation. In R. Vignette (tsDyn), R package (version 0.9-43). [Retrieved from].

Sun, C. (2011). Price dynamics in the import wooden bed market of the United States. Forest Policy and Economics, 13(6), 479-487. doi. 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.05.009

Sun, C. (2015). Asymmetric price transmission (apt): An R package, version 2.4, August 2015. [Retrieved from].

Tarekegn, J. (2002). The impact of foreign aid on public spending the case of Ethiopia. Master Dissertation, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.

Wahid, A.N.M. (2008). An empirical investigation on the nexus between tax revenue and government spending: The case of Turkey. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 16, 46-51.

Westerlund, J., Mahdavi, S. & Firoozi, F. (2011). The tax-spending nexus: Evidence from a panel of US State-local governments. Economic Modeling, 28, 885-890. doi. 10.1016/j.econmod.2010.10.016

Young, A.T. (2009). Tax-spend or fiscal illusion? Allowing for asymmetric revenue effects in expenditure error-correction models. Cato Journal, 29, 469-85.

Zhang, J. (2012). Supporting macroeconomic convergence in African RECs. Regional Integration Policy Paper, No.001.December. African Development Bank, Tunis.

Creative Commons License
This article licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (4.0)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.