Abstract
Abstract. Service learning students can be seen as customers that make consumption for learning experiences from the service products. Service is hard to capture, and service production relies on the interaction between the user and the provider for simultaneous co-production. Also, knowledge and learning is difficult to procure, as it is intangible and rarely transmitted unless the consumer has specific needs that are not being adequately met by the provider. Incorporating the customer in innovation leads to novel ideas for service and also verifies the acceptance and usability of the service. To capture customer knowledge, the employee (and, by extension, firm) awareness of customer needs should be treated as the first priority.
Keywords. Service-learning, Higher education, Academic collaborations Southeast Asia.
JEL. M10, M14.References
Arvanitis, S., Kubli, U., & Woerter, M. (2008). University-industry knowledge and technology transfer in Switzerland: What university scientists think about co-operation with private enterprises. Research Policy, 37(10), 1865-1883. doi. 10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.005
D'Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36(9), 1295-1313. doi. 10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002
de Visser, M., Faems, D., Visscher, K., & de Weerd-Nederhof, P. (2014). The Impact of Team Cognitive Styles on Performance of Radical and Incremental NPD Projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(6), 1167-1180. doi. 10.1111/jpim.12247
Galunic, D.C., & Rodan, S. (1998). Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 19(12), 1193-1201. doi. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(1998120)19:12<1193::AID-SMJ5>3.0.CO;2-F
Giuliani, E., & Arza, V. (2009). What drives the formation of 'valuable' university-industry linkages?: Insights from the wine industry. Research Policy, 38(6), 906-921. doi. 10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.006
Kodama, F., Yusuf, S., & Nabeshima, K. (2008). Introduction to special section on university-industry linkages: The significance of tacit knowledge and the role of intermediaries. Research Policy, 37(8), 1165-1166. doi. 10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.013
Meyer-Krahmer, F., & Schmoch, U. (1998). Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27(8), 835-851. doi. 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00094-8
Pelled, L.H., Eisenhardt, K.M., & Xin, K.R. (1999). Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict, and Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1-28. doi. 10.2307/2667029
Steensma, H.K., & Corley, K.G. (2001). Organizational context as a moderator of theories on firm boundaries. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 271-291. doi. 10.5465/3069455
Szulanski, G. (2000). The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 27-43. doi. 10.1006/obhd.2000.2884
Tsai, F.-S., Baugh, G. S., Fang, S.-C., & Lin, J.L. (2014). Contingent contingency: Knowledge heterogeneity and new product development performance revisited. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(1), 149-169. doi. 10.1007/s10490-013-9355-7