Abstract
Abstract. One of the most important determinants of the distribution of income and life opportunities is education. Increasing levels of formal schooling have contributed to raise standards of living and eradicate extreme poverty worldwide in recent decades. However, inequality in the distribution of income –which is the single most important indicator of relative access to material well-being- remains stubbornly high in most regions of the world. In this paper, I focus on two countries, Chile and Norway, which have very different educational systems, and follow the same analytical methodology of Schütz et al (2008) to detect differences in equality of opportunity between the two countries. In a slight variation, the family-background effect here is represented by a larger number of variables –including household income-, in order to pinpoint the specific characteristics that it comprises in each country. Surprisingly, I find that the family-background effect is stronger in Norway than in Chile, which would denote a potential higher inequality. However the higher achievement inequality in Chile is determined by other factors, which need urgent reform.
Keywords. Chile, Norway, education, inequality, equality of opportunity.
JEL. O15, I24, I25.References
Amar, M. (2007). Equidad, calidad y derecho a la educación en Chile. Study Series Library of Congress Chile, 9
Barro, R., & Lee, J. (2010). A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950-2010. Journal of Development Economics, 104, 184-198. doi. 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.10.001
Benaabdelaali, W., Hanchane, S., & Kamal, A. (2012). Educational Inequality in the World, 1950-2010: Estimates from a new dataset, in John Bishop, Rafael Salas (eds), Inequality, Mobility and Segregation: Essays in Honor of Jacques Silber. Bingley, England: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Carvalho, M,, Gamboa, L.F., & Waltenberg, F. (2012). Equality of educational opportunity employing PISA data: Taking both achievement and access into account. Working Papers Universidad del Rosario, 130.
Chomsky, N. (2012). How the World Works. London: Penguin
Coleman, J. (1968). Equality of educational opportunity. Equity and excellence in education, 6(5), 19-28. doi. 10.1080/0020486680060504
Drago, J.L., & Paredes, R. (2011).The quality gap in Chile’s education system.Cepal Review, 104.
Garces, J.P. (2009). The Quality of Private and Public Education: The case of Chile. Journal of Knowledge Globalization, 2(2), 85-109.
Klingstedt, S. (2001). Equality in education and its application by the court. European Journal for Education Law and Policy 5(1-2), 127-131. doi. 10.1023/B:EELP.0000006741.33477.70
Krugman, P. (2007). The Conscience of a Liberal. New York: Norton
Mizala, A. & Romaguera, P. (2002). Equity and Educational Performance. Economia LACEA, 2(2),
Núñez, J &Miranda, L (2007). Recent findings on intergenerational income and educational mobility in Chile. Working Papers University of Chile, Department of Economics, wp.244.
Parry, T.R., (1997). Achieving balance in decentralization: a case study of education decentralization in Chile. World Development, 25(2), 211-225. doi. 10.1016/S0305-750X(96)00094-0
Piketty, T. (2013). Le capital au XXIe siècle. Paris: Seuil
Ramos, J., Coble, D., Elfernan, R., & Soto, C. (2013). The impact of cognitive skills on professional salaries in an emerging economy, Chile. The Developing Economies, 51(1), 1-33. doi. 10.1111/deve.12000
Reich, R (2012). Beyond Outrage. New York: Random House
Schütz, G., Ursprung, H., & Wößmann, L (2008). Education Policy and Equality of Opportunity. Kyklos, 61(2), 279-308. doi. 10.1111/j.1467-6435.2008.00402.x
Stiglitz, J (2012). The Price of Inequality. New York: Norton
Thomas, V., Wang, Y., & Fan, X. (2000). Measuring Education Inequality: Gini Coefficients of Education. World Bank Policy Research Working Papers, No. 2525. doi. 10.1596/1813-9450-2525
Torche, F. (2005). Privatization reform and inequality of educational opportunity: The case of Chile. Sociology of Education, 78(4), 316-343. doi. 10.1177/003804070507800403
