Economics of WTO plus: No to conflict and Yes to regionalism
PDF

Keywords

Trade
Institutions
Education
Regionalism
Conflict Mitigation.

How to Cite

MAMOON, D. (2017). Economics of WTO plus: No to conflict and Yes to regionalism. Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, 4(4), 365–369. https://doi.org/10.1453/jsas.v4i4.1462

Abstract

Abstract. The paper makes a case for effective regionalism in South Asia by developing such conflict mitigation strategies between India and Pakistan that exploit their proximity to global trade. The welfare enhancing measures for nation states become more startling when they not only invest in institutional development but also become an active part of the global village with regionalism as a viable means to achieve this objective.

Keywords. Trade, Institutions, Education, Regionalism, Conflict mitigation.

JEL. F10, F15, F16.

https://doi.org/10.1453/jsas.v4i4.1462
PDF

References

Glaeser, E.L., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2004). Do institutions cause growth, Journal of Economic Growth, 9(3), 271-303. doi. 10.1023/B:JOEG.0000038933.16398.ed

Mamoon, D. (2008). Trade, Poverty, Inequality and Security, Shaker Publishing, The Netherlands.

Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development, Journal of Economic Growth, 9(2), 131-65. doi. 10.1023/B:JOEG.0000031425.72248.85

Creative Commons License
This article licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (4.0)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.