Abstract
Abstracto. The conceptual framework of the capability approach proposed by Amartya Sen has never been used specifically in the dynamics of forced displacement or in the analysis of the quality of life of the population victims of the Colombian armed conflict. Reason why, this article affirms that the approach of capabilities agrees with the differential approach proposed by the Colombian Constitutional Court. Consequently, the objective is to provide a conceptual aproximation to the capability approach of Amartya Sen and differential approach proposed by the from Colombia Constitutional Court and to point out that the capability approach is relevant in the design, implementation and evaluation of public policies directed at the victim population. Similarly, recent data on the dynamics of forced displacement in the city of Bucaramanga (Colombia) are provided.
Palabras clave. Sen's capability approach, Forced Displacement, Colombian Armed Conflict, capabilitarian, Amartya Sen
JEL. I31, I32, D63.References
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, JA (2013). Por qué fracasan las naciones: Los orígenes del poder, la prosperidad y la pobreza . Negocio de la corona.
Alkire, S. (2005). ¿Por qué el enfoque de capacidad? Journal of Human Development , 6 (1), 115 - 135. https://doi.org/10.1080/146498805200034275
Alsop, R., Bertelsen, MF, & Holland, J. (2006). Empoderamiento en la Práctica: Del Análisis a la Implementación . Desarrollo . https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-6450-5
Ballon, P. (2013). La selección de funciones y capacidades: una encuesta de estudios empíricos. Asociación para la Política Económica (PEP) . (Disponible en URL: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/160427/2/1378810639-WP_2013-09_P.Ballon.pdf).
Comim, F., Qizilbash, M., y Alkire, S. (Eds.). (2008). El enfoque de la capacidad: conceptos, medidas y aplicaciones . Prensa de la Universidad de Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492587
Corte Constitucional. (2004). Sentencia T- 025 . MP. Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa. Referencia: Expediente T-653010 y acumulados. (Disponible en URL: http://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2004/t-025-04.htm).
Crocker, D. (2003). Globalización y desarrollo humano: aproximaciones éticas. Republicanismo y educación cívica:Más allá del liberalismo, 75-98. (Available at URL:http://biblio3.url.edu.gt/PROFASR/DRL/globali_desarro.pdf).
Crocker, D. A. (2008). Ethics of global development: Agency, capability, and deliberative democracy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492594
Crocker, D. A. (2016). Enfrentando la desigualdad y la corrupción: Agencia, empoderamiento y desarrollo democrático. Veritas, (34), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-92732016000100003
Crocker, D. A. and I. Robeyns, 2009, “Capability and agency” in: Christopher Morris (ed.), The Philosophy of Amartya Sen, Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 60–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511800511.005
Fukuda-Parr, S. (2003). The human development paradigm: operationalizing Sen's ideas on capabilities. Feminist economics, 9(2-3), 301-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570022000077980
Ibáñez, A., & Velásquez, A. (2008). La Política Pública para atender a la población desplazada: ¿Cuáles deben ser las funciones de las autoridades locales? (Available at URL: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/1203_colombia_ibanez_spa.pdf).
Ibrahim, S., & Alkire, S. (2007). Agency and empowerment: A proposal for internationally comparable indicators. Oxford development studies, 35(4), 379-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810701701897
Kuklys W. (2005). Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach: Theoretical Insights and Empirical Applications. Studies in Choice and Welfare, (Available at URL: http://www.springer.com/la/book/9783540261988#otherversion=9783642065620)
Lyons, J. Q., Monterroza, A. M. N., & Meza, M. I. (2016). La figura del estado de cosas inconstitucionales como mecanismo de protección de los derechos fundamentales de la población vulnerable em Colombia. Revista Jurídica Mario Alario D’Filippo, 69-80. (Available at URL: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4767667)
Malhotra, A., & Schuler, S. R. (2005). Women’s empowerment as a variable in international development. Measuring empowerment: Cross-disciplinary perspectives, 71-88. (Available at URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3884/dd80b9b88a18251a608d47ecda59b5a0f528.pdf).
Mason, K. O., & Smith, H. L. (2003). Women’s empowerment and social context: Results from five Asian countries. Gender and Development Group, World Bank, Washington, DC. (Available at URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6842/3faadedb45524c55263554bea269d2f4fb15.pdf).
Narayan, D. (2002). Empowerment and poverty reduction: A sourcebook. World Bank Publications. (Available at URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/15239)
Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). Women and human development: The capabilities approach (Vol. 3). Cambridge University Press.
Oakley, P. (Ed.). (2001). Evaluating Empowerment: Reviewing the concept and practice. Oxford: Intrac.
Robeyns, I. (2000). An unworkable idea or a promising alternative?: Sen's capability approach re-examined. (Available at URL: https://feb.kuleuven.be/drc/Economics/research/dps-papers/dps00/dps0030.pdf).
Robeyns, I. (2003).Sen's Capability Approach and Gender Inequality: Selecting Relevant Capabilities, Feminist Economics, 9(2/3): 61–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570022000078024
Robeyns, I. (2004). Justice as fairness and the capability approach. Paper read at the Fourth International Conference on the Capability Approach: Enhancing Human Security. September 5–7, Pavia, Italy. (Available at URL: https://www.academia.edu/621272/Justice_as_fairness_and_the_capability_approach).
Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: a theoretical survey. Journal of human development, 6(1), 93-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/146498805200034266
Robeyns, I. (2011). The capability approach. Handbook of economics and ethics, 39. (Available at URL: https://seop.illc.uva.nl/entries/capability-approach/).
Robeyns, I. (2016). Capabilitarianism. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 17(3), 397-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2016.1145631
Robinson, J. A. (2015). The misery in Colombia. Desarrollo y Sociedad, (76), 9-90. (Available at URL: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/dys/n76/n76a02.pdf)
Rowlands, J. (1997). Questioning empowerment: Working with women in Honduras. Oxfam. https://doi.org/10.3362/9780855988364
Sen, A. (1979). Equality of What? In S. M. McMurrin (ed.) Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Stanford University. (Available at URL: http://www.ophi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Sen-1979_Equality-of-What.pdf)
Sen, A. (1981). Poverty and famines: an essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford university press. (Available at URL: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/891971468740987036/pdf/multi-page.pdf#page=214).
Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam, North Holland.
Sen, A. (1985a). Bienestar, agencia y libertad: Las conferencias Dewey 1984. La revista de filosofía , 82 (4), 169-221. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026184
Sen, A. (1992). La desigualdad reexaminada . Cambridge, MA: Prensa de la Universidad de Harvard.
Uphoff, N. (2005). Aspectos Analíticos en la Medición del Empoderamiento a Nivel Comunitario y Local, en: D. Narayan (ed.), Measuring Empowerment: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives (Washington, DC, Banco Mundial), 219-246. (Disponible en URL: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/es/960161468175149824/pdf/344100PAPER0Me101Official0use0only1.pdf#page=241).
